Chess is just a Game of luck

Of course, a more advanced brain, pure genetics

a father who supported and financed him from a very young age, traveling the world playing tournaments at the age of 9

the incredible luck of Carlsen and how he became world champion through the defeat of Kramnik in the 2013 Candidates in the final game, which allowed him to challenge Anand, even though Carlsen himself lost his game against Svidler in that last round of the Candidates, etc. But the thing is, one round before, Carlsen won a completely drawn position easily against Radjabov, which allowed him to 'fight' until the very last moment against Kramnik, who only needed a draw with black pieces against Ivanchuk in the final round, and still, Vladimir Kramnik lost, playing a very strange Pirc, an opening he never plays

The famous blunder of Anand vs Carlsen in the 2014 World Chess Championship, Game number 6. Carlsen won that game, but he should have lost it.

Then why use an alt to make dumb posts use your main you goof

I don't remember the password, clown

frfr

how would he know that? baffoon.

He should know it before insulting without reason, just like you, dimwit

HIIIII!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! um chess is a game of strat not luck. In what way is it a game of luck?

Chess masters would 99% beat someone who must learned the moves but if it was luck based it would have to be like randomly choosing a piece and where they move

players with more skill win more often. it would have to be randomized in some way for it to be close to 50/50 but there is no randomization just skill

Um how would he know? Its not his fault he cant read minds

Also pls be kind

I agree, everything is luck, if only I was born into a wealthy family, then I wouldn't need to find a real job!

That's what I've been referring to from the beginning, which is why you can't talk about percentages or statistics.

A game is always won by the player who has the most luck.

It turns out that Carlsen is the luckiest player on the planet because his brain is the most efficient (genetic luck), and he has also been lucky in the process of becoming world champion , as well as in his early development with the support of his family, which helped him become who he is.

That's why I say that the result is always predetermined.

You can't say you have a 50% chance of winning

that's a typical fallacy and not real.

If you end up winning the game, it means you always had a 100% chance but you did not know in the past !

lol real

Get out of my thread, clown.

Hadn't you blocked me? Stop commenting on my threads too , you absolute psycho.

your the one who decided to create a debate in the comment sections what do you expect

He blocked me in his thread so I couldn’t reply to his insult, and now he comes to my thread to bother me. It’s clear what he’s doing.

nah I think he blocked u so he can reply to your threads without you being able to do anything about it actually I need to test something rn I'll bloc you for a sec

Chess, the game itself, is not luck based. It's skill based. Build up ideas, learn, etc, and you'll improve. Improvement comes from gaining skill, and gaining skill comes through learning.

the report button doesn't show up after I block someone lol