Chess is not an art

Sort:
Avatar of Writch
El_Senior wrote:

Chess will be an art when chessplayers can get government subsidies/funding/tax dollars to "create" games. Sure, there will be beautiful moves and beautiful games but...to be considered art you have to be able to make money 

I can hardly wait. I got this high concept piece where I place a 6" Staunton king into a jar of urine.

Avatar of FlowerFlowers

Nabokov spent considerable time during his exile on the composition of chess problems. Such compositions he published in the Russian émigré press, Poems and Problems (18 chess compositions) and Speak, Memory (one problem). He describes the process of composing and constructing in his memoir: "The strain on the mind is formidable; the element of time drops out of one's consciousness..." To him, the "originality, invention, conciseness, harmony, complexity, and splendid insincerity" of creating a chess problem was similar to that in any other art.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Nabokov

Avatar of Atos

Hm yes, chess problems come closer to being an art form because there the primary goal is indeed to produce an aesthetic effect. But personally I find a Tal game that occurred in 'real time' more impressive than any composed problem.

Avatar of Musikamole

The word tempo is used in both music and chess.

Chess also has rhythm.


Avatar of TheGrobe

When I play it, chess not only has rhythm, but also blues.

Avatar of goldendog
Writch wrote:

I can hardly wait. I got this high concept piece where I place a 6" Staunton king into a jar of urine.


Placing kings in jars of urine is so 1990s.

Avatar of guitarzan
electricpawn wrote:
guitarzan wrote:

electricpawn wrote:

"What do you think of this, Guitarzan? This is my kind of art!"

Hmm, ... Johnny 'Guitar' Watson, huh? I first saw him on Soul Train over 30 years ago. What a hoot! I guess if a comic book were art, then Johnny 'Guitar' Watson would be art, too - the guy is a cartoon character! Honestly, the most art going on there is designing his suits! LOL!

 

 


Maybe his style of music doesn't apeal to you, but you have to admit the guy can play. I kind of miss Soul Train.


I get a kick out of your tastes in music, electricpawn. You might be surprised to learn I used to own that Mothers of Invention FREAK OUT album, and I had ABSOLUTELY FREE, too. I should have kept those - they're probably worth something today.

BTW, I'm not putting down Johnny 'Guitar' Watson or his playing; I just think it's fair to analogize him & his music with a comic book when speaking of art, that's all. Some of those cartoon artists can really draw!

Avatar of blake78613

It is impossible to debate the question without comming to a an agreed definition of art.  But one of your premises is clearly incorrect.  Chess uses both sides of the brain.

Avatar of Musikamole
TheGrobe wrote:

When I play it, chess not only has rhythm, but also blues.


Very well said!

Avatar of FlowerFlowers

chess is just a game, a fun game that people love, and so they tend to romanticize about it a bit, and begin to exhalt it, and before you know they've given it more credit than reality would.  perhaps a chess player feels artistic when creating new games which is sane, games are solitary battles between one man (or woman) with another.  There is so much beauty that chess inspires and so the culture that follows behind chess is a lovely addition to the world.  These things that accompany chess are beautiful, and maybe the time spent between two people (or less or more) can be considered art, but chess is still a game.  A beautiful game, and the people that make games and a game as fancy as chess  can be considered artists.  So my opinion is that chess is simply a game, and that art can be seen in all parts of life so chess can be considered art... if you want.

Avatar of orangehonda
Deranged wrote:

Why do people say that chess is an art? Chess is pretty much the complete opposite of art. There are two sides of the brain: the logical/reasoning side and the creative/artistical side, and chess is all logic and reasoning. It's all precise calculations and deep thinking in order to find a rational solution.

I enjoy chess, but I do not believe that it is an art. It may or may not be a sport, but I will not go into that in this topic. But let's look at the reasons why some people think it is an art:

1. The chessboard is like a canvas where you can develop whatever crazy ideas you think of onto it.

2. The moves are like a symphony of music that flow together so well, but if one incorrect move is wrong, it makes the whole thing flawed.

What are your thoughts?


That the brain is sometimes thought of as divided is not a logical argument for logic being the opposite of art.  Not to mention brain function is not so two dimensional.  Also, you don't support your main argument which is that chess is purely logical.

Many beautiful things involve symmetry and and proportions such as a sculpture of a person or musical scales.  Logical things like math and artsy things like sculpture and music are intertwined, they're not opposites.

Relatively few positions in chess require but one response.  If logic and art were separated, and if chess were purely logic, then there would be no way to resolve countless moves without first completely solving chess.  When a person has multiple logical continuations their style and creativity shows through.  Sometimes these moves are based on factors such as the clock or the opponent's temperament -- very logical consideration but  they can lead to surprising and aesthetically pleasing play.

Of course like Trysts said, it's ultimately in the eye of the beholder.  Many people throughout history, not the least of which were world champions, have found beauty and art in chess.

Avatar of bach_of_chess
tonydal wrote:
FlowerFlowers wrote:

chess is just a game, a fun game that people love, and so they tend to romanticize about it a bit, and begin to exhalt it, and before you know they've given it more credit than reality would.

I'll go along with that.  Sure there's art in chess (and an art to the game), but I think the people trying to make an Art out of it are saying more about their own hopes and inclinations than they are about the game itself.


Some things are more artsier than others though.

Avatar of FlowerFlowers

perhaps then just as there is an art of war ... there is an art to chess.

Avatar of theoreticalboy

I think that settles it.  Let's return to more important matters.  Chess is also not:

- a pre-novel example of magic realism

- the name Alekhine gave to the birthmark on his right buttock

- an item of clothing worn by members of Peruvian marching bands

- a love song

- the dying words of an industrial magnate murdered; but by whom?

Avatar of TheGrobe
tonydal wrote:
Musikamole wrote:

The word tempo is used in both music and chess.

Chess also has rhythm.



They both also have motifs.


And intermezzos (Zwischenzug).

Avatar of gorgeous_vulture

Also, a crap musical

Avatar of TheGrobe

Also: a type of pie.

Avatar of FlowerFlowers

chess pie ************** mkyam

Avatar of Atos

Chess is quite chessical and chessy.

Avatar of Writch
pushwood47 wrote:

Now they are covering an object of veneration with ants. (big windup follows)

So if they covered a chess piece with ants, and got as much criticism, and had to withdraw it, would that be... (the pitch:)

en passe-ant?


BA-dum *psssssshhhh*