just have fun, who cares about rating? rating is just a number
Chess isn't fun. WHY CAN'T I WIN???
Sort:
Nov 12, 2024
0
#103
Chess is hard, it doesn't matter how good you get. You will always lose, because of many issues such as mood, sleep, time, skill, or many others. Take a break and come back in a month. I personally have a mode I just play for fun like blitz and then I play rapid with more serious intention.
Nov 19, 2024
0
#104
You guys relize if you don't liek the game don't play it. I play because I like to see the tears of my ememys.
game not fun, cannot win
PastaOfTheMind wrote:
the problem according to the post game computer analysis is that you played your level and your opponent played double their level. solution: just play double your level, then you'll win 50/50.
(actually i think it's hard capped at right about double to avoid being truly ridiculous)
That "level" is rigged. Proof: take pgn, edit Elo, load into analysis, observe that level changing and even proportion of great/excellent moves changes. Rigged completely. If you have higher Elo they won't risk telling you your play is 100-level. Huge lie. 100-level is random-moving monkey level, should never be assigned to anyone.
Because you don't try :fish :stockfish
basketstorm wrote:
That "level" is rigged.
My good dude I get that you're trolling and wheee fun but what part of the irony present in "solution: just play double your level, then you'll win" evaded you?
kadinisatryhard wrote:
Because you don't try :fish :stockfish
They say if you teach a man to stock fish....
Ultra_Chessman101 wrote:
You guys relize if you don't liek the game don't play it. I play because I like to see the tears of my ememys.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oo9buo9Mtos
This happens a lot to everyone. It’s called tilt. Also your rating may have never been stable in the first place, might’ve got to 800’s by luck. But the good news is, the more u drop and the more u get back to 800. Then ur truly at least an 800 player. Keep studying more to break into 900’s and eventually 1000
I’ve hit 1900’s for like the third or fourth time of my life. Always falling below 1900. But now I can truly call myself a 1900 player because I’ve stabilized my rating
PastaOfTheMind wrote:
basketstorm wrote:
That "level" is rigged.
My good dude I get that you're trolling and wheee fun but what part of the irony present in "solution: just play double your level, then you'll win" evaded you?
My good dude, you can check yourself that it is rigged, if you deny obvious fact that is easy to check you're just a troll.
Nov 19, 2024
0
#114
The problem is that you resign when you lose a piece or two.There is no point resigning because you can try to do stalemate or maybe try to do a quick checkmate that the opponent wont see!
Nov 19, 2024
0
#115
Join the forum Stopping Trollers. Together, we can get rid of people like basketstorm. If enough of us protest, they have to listen
AlekhineEnthusiast46 wrote:
Join the forum Stopping Trollers. Together, we can get rid of people like basketstorm. If enough of us protest, they have to listen
How did I troll you? Do you know that whatever you are doing now is a personal targeted attack and it is not allowed by chesscom rules?
Nov 20, 2024
0
#117
Guys this is dumb, the way to win is not to play. If you play 1 game, and win, then you have a better win-loss ratio than Carlson.
Ultra_Chessman101 wrote:
Guys this is dumb, the way to win is not to play. If you play 1 game, and win, then you have a better win-loss ratio than Carlson.
No skill tho
Skilz issues
Nov 20, 2024
0
#119
Nobody needs skill, but everyone needs easy bragging rights.
That is why chess was invented
the problem according to the post game computer analysis is that you played your level and your opponent played double their level. solution: just play double your level, then you'll win 50/50.
(actually i think it's hard capped at right about double to avoid being truly ridiculous)