Chess.com novice tries to think like a computer but (surprise) still can't beat Magnus

Sort:
lfPatriotGames
HobbyPIayer wrote:
cap78red wrote:

in my third ever game I beat a 1800 elo player and in my 5 th I drew with a 1816

Impressive for a beginner. But still—a beginner beating an 1800 is a far cry from a beginner beating a 2800.

Even an experienced 2500-level Grandmaster stands little chance against Magnus. To think that a novice could beat him after a month's training is silly.

I dont remember my third game ever, but I didn't even know how all the pieces moved and it was probably a 200 rated player that easily beat me. To beat a 1800 player for someones third game is incredibly impressive, I think far more impressive than any of the feats Max accomplished. Someone studying hard for a month and beating the world champion seems more possible to me than a beginner beating an 1800. Only a true genius could do either one.

pretzel2

just because somebody is playing their third game doesn't mean they are a beginner.

pretzel2

tournament game, i mean. used to be all kinds of unrated players taking home prizes in open events.

HobbyPIayer
pretzel2 wrote:

tournament game, i mean. used to be all kinds of unrated players taking home prizes in open events.

True.

But I assume that poster meant he'd only played two games of chess in his life prior to beating an 1800.

The reincarnation of Morphy? tongue.png

lfPatriotGames
HobbyPIayer wrote:
pretzel2 wrote:

tournament game, i mean. used to be all kinds of unrated players taking home prizes in open events.

True.

But I assume that poster meant he'd only played two games of chess in his life prior to beating an 1800.

The reincarnation of Morphy?

That's what I assumed also. If it was his third (tournament) game ever it could also have been his third (grandmaster) game ever or his third (assisted) game ever or third (professional) game ever. In which case it wouldn't have been so impressive. It seems to me third game ever means third game  ever.

krudsparov

His 3rd game that week more like!

The-Qcumber
K_Brown wrote:

It was an interesting concept for an interesting guy.

 

The 40-pull ups in a month bit drew my attention (would be really hard if done correctly), but then I saw that he didn't do even 1 real pull up and set rules so that he didn't have to. 

 

I only counted 1 pull-up.

Pulpofeira

Pull-ups are named "dominated" here, and for one good reason.

dfgh123

"I wanted an excuse to concentrate specifically on my back (the weakest part of my body)"

proceeds to use a range of motion on pullups that only hits biceps.

Nabium

Now here's how you solve a Rubik's Cube:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_gHa2x2OQA

 

Or this one:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5x8jgGX3iNM

 

Goose bumps!

 

In my view, Max beating Magnus in a month would be the equivalent to solving three Rubik's cubes while juggling... in 4.59 seconds. It's just not done, why even pretend like it's possible is beyond me, someone in WSJ is smoking old socks.

ponz111

My very first game of tournament chess I beat an expert. I had the Black side of the Ruy Lopez.  

Elroch

ponz is an ex-US correspondence chess champion, so that's not the most accurate description. wink.png

IMKeto
IainLim wrote:
Magnus was shaking during the match! The unthinkable happened: Max was WINNING after 11 moves! (+0.1 according to Stockfish LOL)

Just goes to show, how anyone can be great at chess for 11 moves.  But when the game really starts (after the opening) the men get seperated from the boys.

SmyslovFan

This patzer didn't survive the opening.

tipish

SmyslovFan wrote:

This patzer didn't survive the opening.

his chess.com rating is 1100... he can't even beat a 1200.

SmyslovFan

Oh? What's his chess.com handle?

 

azer52

Some people are saying that this guy is just a "con artist"...

notmtwain

I don't think he is a con artist. I was very impressed with the other 11 skills he developed.

I see that some of the Navy Seals here have criticized his pullups but I doubt if 1 in 1000 here can do any better. 

You can criticize his perfect pitch, etc. I think he did a very creditable job in all of them.

However, that said, he was naive about how much time it would take him to develop a chess-playing algorithm. The whole approach of trying to learn to think like a computer seems ludicrous.

His algorithm wasn't done. He had to rely on his casually developed chess skills, which were modest. I think he was brave to show up.

notmtwain
SmyslovFan wrote:

Oh? What's his chess.com handle?

 

https://www.chess.com/member/maxdeutsch

chesster3145
SmyslovFan wrote:

Oh? What's his chess.com handle?

 

Now his blitz rating is 960...