Chess pieces' values

Sort:
technical_knockout

i've completed every lesson.

Jahnavi-Shankar

Well, if a Bishop is stronger than a Knight, that depends on the position.

Jahnavi-Shankar

Seems that all the pieces' values depend on the position.

Jahnavi-Shankar
technical_knockout wrote:

i've completed every lesson.

Nice.

Jahnavi-Shankar

What do you think about the pieces' values?

technical_knockout

i basically use the 1,3,3,5,9 numbers:

only +8 for a promoted pawn, since you trade that pawn in for your new queen... i do think there's extra value associated with the bishop pair in an open position, since they are long range, have the ability to pin & are strong on both colors... +0.25 for each bishop seems fair, though i don't calculate it that way.

Jahnavi-Shankar

It is complicated.

Jahnavi-Shankar

Especially between a Bishop and a Knight.

fifoma09

i like the bishop i would give it a 3,75 points

Jahnavi-Shankar

Bishops should be slightly better than knights.

fifoma09

i agree

MaestroDelAjedrez2025

You are right

silviosponza
Jahnavi-Shankar wrote:

And their values in the past.

18th century (Modenese School): The earliest standard values were established, with the queen valued at 9 points, rook at 5, bishop and knight at 3, and pawn at 1.

19th century (Howard Staunton & others): Some early sources suggested slightly different values, such as the queen being worth 9.94, rook 5.48, bishop 3.50, knight 3.05, and pawn 1.00.

Early 20th century (Hermann Vogler): Some theorists experimented with alternative values, such as the queen being worth 10 points, rook 5.84, bishop 3.53, knight 2.89, and pawn 0.5.

you can read my post #76 at this topic

MaestroDelAjedrez2025

Ok

fifoma09

ok

Jahnavi-Shankar

There is a reason why it is important to learn about the chess pieces' values. They help us a lot, especially in exchanges.

fifoma09

i agree

Jahnavi-Shankar

And that is why, I made a forum about it.

Jahnavi-Shankar

Rarely do people make ones like that.

Jahnavi-Shankar

Why is a queen worth more than a rook and bishop combined?