Wine has its own rating system
And donuts too
Chess rating system
Sort:
hahahaaa
Mar 22, 2017
0
#2504
Beim Training habe ich das Problem: der Computer antwortet nicht auf meine richtige Lösung und wertet mir dafür 0. Wie kann man das Problem lösen?
Martin_Stahl wrote:
AWSmith61 wrote:
11hub: Daily Chess rating is 'correspondence chess'. You have days to complete each move. I *think* it's OK to use databases but not a computer engine for those. I'd love some official comment or reference to chess.com's rules for daily chess and databases. I never use them in it b/c well... it smells like cheating and I don't see the point of playing chess if one's going to cheat. My rating is mine. And I really play against my own mind.
...
https://support.chess.com/customer/en/portal/articles/1444879-fair-play-on-chess-com-what-you-need-to-know
Basically, for Daily, no engines, tablebases, or actual people giving you moves. Books, databases (that don't contain a bunch of numerical computer evaluations and are mostly human vs human games), videos, magazines, etc are allowed to be referred to in ongoing games.
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
About, the rating system, I used to play a lot. At the time, I wasn't so great and my rating stayed 1200-1400.
Now, my USCF rating has been in the 1400s, which should translate to 1600 here? I don't play that much, and I'm finding the system frustrating.
Rigged!
Apr 11, 2017
0
#2509
If you chess rating is wrong, try GO or Bridge or Golf...
The rating system is very precise and will indicate your chance of beating a higher rated player.
Squarely wrote:
If you chess rating is wrong, try GO or Bridge or Golf...
The rating system is very precise and will indicate your chance of beating a higher rated player.
I'm not trying GO or Bridge or Golf... I'm trying to get better at chess.
I don't play as much as I study positions and tactics. But I need to play to get better, and I want to be able to verse better people...
Eleanor2003 wrote:
who cares about ratings? they are just numbers
I've been trying to get at this... they determine who you play. The higher your rating, the higher the level of your player. The better you get.
It isn't about looking good. It's about playing better people in order to get better.
This is no use...
Yessssssssss......finally won my 1st chess game ever!!! Ok it was against the computer level was only on 2 but who cares lol
No dfv, I just decided to put more effort into learning this game. thanks
USCF rating against real people... chess.com rating is against a lot of computer hidden/cheat players, therefore your chess.com rating is lower..
is 1200 a good rating
Apr 17, 2017
0
#2519
bluejibb wrote:
is 1200 a good rating
To a 1000 rated player, sure. Everything is relative.
For most people, a rating starting at 2000 is good. Magnus Carlsen, who's living at +2800, generally doesn't show respect to any opponent below 2700.
1200 is the rating floor. 1200 seems sensible to me because anybody (even a novice) can join chess.com, for whom assigning a higher initial rating won't be appropriate. But in tournaments meant for stronger players, higher rating may be assigned to start with. Read the wikipedia article on Elo rating system to get a better idea about it.
i don't know the answer to the question