Chess Speaks for itself

Sort:
Avatar of Anonymous_Dragon

Imagine scoring no points in an entire 7 round tournament . 

 

Avatar of mrfreezyiceboy

Gotta feel bad for him

Avatar of Anonymous_Dragon
mrfreezyiceboy wrote:

Gotta feel bad for him

Avatar of SparkFight
mrfreezyiceboy wrote:

Gotta feel bad for him

no I wouldn't feel bad after all he's said and his pathetic attitude. I hate him, I watch his games to watch him lose, and I am happy with the outcome of this tournament.

Avatar of Anonymous_Dragon
Batman2508 wrote:
mrfreezyiceboy wrote:

Gotta feel bad for him

no I wouldn't feel bad after all he's said and his pathetic attitude. I hate him, I watch his games to watch him lose, and I am happy with the outcome of this tournament.

We atleast gotta give him credit for the memes and content

Avatar of assassin3752

who are ya'l taking abt

Avatar of Anonymous_Dragon
assassin3752 wrote:

who are ya'l taking abt

Hans Nieman 

Avatar of x-1198923638

He's just slightly socially off, hates giving interviews, and therefore gives crap interviews.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Ztwr-Q9wko

not even close to the weakest GM tho, he's ranked top 50

Avatar of Kowarenai

more like the photos speak for themselves

Avatar of Kowarenai
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
Batman2508 wrote:
mrfreezyiceboy wrote:

Gotta feel bad for him

no I wouldn't feel bad after all he's said and his pathetic attitude. I hate him, I watch his games to watch him lose, and I am happy with the outcome of this tournament.

We atleast gotta give him credit for the memes and content

i was there and honestly hans was just a statue of death staring at people, he just wanted to leave and was only there for like maybe 5 minutes when i was in line. barely nobody stood there for his signature while i was in both to get aronian and liems as well, he is just always a card

Avatar of Kowarenai
TrainingOnATrain wrote:

Is that a bag for uber eats?

no its the chessboard they gave that comes along when buying the chess24 ticket, i was trying to get all the players signatures on that board and i only ended up missing 2 - firouzja and magnus

Avatar of lfPatriotGames
TrainingOnATrain wrote:

GM Hans Niemann refuses to pay $5 for a charity tournament

 

I don't understand why a grandmaster feels like they shouldn't pay to enter a chess tournament. I assume they keep the money if they win something. I must be missing something. 

Avatar of SparkFight
lfPatriotGames wrote:
TrainingOnATrain wrote:

GM Hans Niemann refuses to pay $5 for a charity tournament

 

I don't understand why a grandmaster feels like they shouldn't pay to enter a chess tournament. I assume they keep the money if they win something. I must be missing something. 

Its in respect of titled players so they don't have to pay

Avatar of Kowarenai

i feel like titled players shouldnt have to pay or at least get a discount but i mean that still doesn't excuse the fact that hans didn't choose to pay 5 bucks for a charity event which is very sad

Avatar of lfPatriotGames
Batman2508 wrote:
lfPatriotGames wrote:
TrainingOnATrain wrote:

GM Hans Niemann refuses to pay $5 for a charity tournament

 

I don't understand why a grandmaster feels like they shouldn't pay to enter a chess tournament. I assume they keep the money if they win something. I must be missing something. 

Its in respect of titled players so they don't have to pay

OK, now I know I'm missing something. I understand the respect earned for being a grandmaster. There are like about 1700 of them in the entire world. I thought the respect is in the title itself, grandmaster. That's an extremely rare position to hold. 

But I don't understand why they wouldn't have to pay to enter a tournament where they get to keep money if they win. In golf the OWGR ranks players based on performance and if someone can get in the top 50 (a MUCH more rare feat than being a grandmaster) they are exempt from certain tournament requirements. But they still have to pay to enter. Which makes sense because if they are in the world top 50 they have a much better chance of winning than most. 

I realize there are different ability levels in a chess tournament, whereas in a golf tournament only the best compete, but I still don't understand why someone who keeps money they win feels like they shouldn't pay to participate. 

Avatar of lfPatriotGames

I don't doubt it's common, I just don't understand why. Why would the players who have the best chance of winning not have to pay to enter?

The only reason I can think of it grandmasters have wasted enough time to become a grandmaster that they have not developed earning potential. So they are all (or mostly all) broke. Whereas someone who is rated much lower has pursued a career or earning potential and can afford the entry fee. I think if a GM can't afford a hundred dollar entry fee they should seriously consider a different career path. 

Avatar of Kowarenai

its just a way of giving honor to someone who has dedicated their life towards GM cause in a way its basically like giving a retired soldier money for their efforts in our country, its controversial tho

Avatar of lfPatriotGames

I can see why it's controversial. It reminds me of the guy who is the first to show up for a party, but never brings anything and thinks nobody will notice. There is always someone who wants something for nothing. 

Avatar of lfPatriotGames
TrainingOnATrain wrote:
lfPatriotGames wrote:

I don't doubt it's common, I just don't understand why. Why would the players who have the best chance of winning not have to pay to enter?

 

The GM status attracts players, more players, more money overall. Why does Tom Brady do the "Let's Go" Hertz commercials?

 

In the end, they get more money. Why do we have to pay subscriptions on Twitch to play GMs, but the GMs don't have to subscribe to us? Same thing.

I don't know, but it does make them look like cheapskates. Of course I would never pay money to play a grandmaster because there is no value in it for me. But that's just me. 

Avatar of lfPatriotGames

If the GM wont pay 10 dollars to help a charity then that just reaffirms their cheapskate status. In other professions the high level participant would be ashamed and embarrassed if they refused to help out. Often it's the complete opposite, the people at the very highest level pay even MORE than everyone else because they want the perception of helping more, caring more. Which in turn motivates more people to also help out or participate. 

Maybe GMs have spent so much time playing chess they haven't learned the social skills necessary to recognize when they should be embarrassed. I don't know, but either way it's not a good look.