chess vs. lichess comparison...

Sort:
VividNothing

Why can't I win on chess.com?? I have no issues accruing wins on lichess. And every couple games I get a message that I was cheated and have points returned...... Why is that? Do players simply have more integrity at a dot org? I would honestly like this explained..

And don't try and simple it with non-sense like "Oh players are just better on chess dot com." Because that is a non0sense reasoning.. There are good players everywhere. But I can't seem to win even the dumbest match ups. And my players are less intelligent on this site. It's the physics. It's the cheaters and it's other overall nature of the game.. But then WHY STILL is is soooooo tough to win games on here. I'm doomed in stone league unless I become the scum and just use a computer and cheat, which removes all honor from a game based upon that very thing....... ANd if you got no honor, you got no heart - If you got no heart - stay out of chess.... Wanna be heartless? Become a politician..

I'm saying the players pool on chess dot com is NEAR TOXIC compared to the lichess.... They must be cracking down better over there. ps. chess rules PPS. I'm fit to start my own chess website.. this stuff is not rocket science.. I want a site where there are points but the points don't matter and it's all just play chess and blow steam for fun.... In Fact.. I want an option where I can have an account just for fun - exempt it from being judged by ratings. Your rating is just a number...

justbefair
VividNothing wrote:

Why can't I win on chess.com?? I have no issues accruing wins on lichess. And every couple games I get a message that I was cheated and have points returned...... Why is that? Do players simply have more integrity at a dot org? I would honestly like this explained..

And don't try and simple it with non-sense like "Oh players are just better on chess dot com." Because that is a non0sense reasoning.. There are good players everywhere. But I can't seem to win even the dumbest match ups. And my players are less intelligent on this site. It's the physics. It's the cheaters and it's other overall nature of the game.. But then WHY STILL is is soooooo tough to win games on here. I'm doomed in stone league unless I become the scum and just use a computer and cheat, which removes all honor from a game based upon that very thing....... ANd if you got no honor, you got no heart - If you got no heart - stay out of chess.... Wanna be heartless? Become a politician..

I'm saying the players pool on chess dot com is NEAR TOXIC compared to the lichess.... They must be cracking down better over there. ps. chess rules PPS. I'm fit to start my own chess website.. this stuff is not rocket science.. I want a site where there are points but the points don't matter and it's all just play chess and blow steam for fun.... In Fact.. I want an option where I can have an account just for fun - exempt it from being judged by ratings. Your rating is just a number...

Despite a lengthy membership, you have only played 17 games. It looks like your last opponents to be banned for cheating happened more than two years ago... so I wouldn't call that every couple of games.

At any rate, welcome back. I think you need to give it a longer try. You were winning your last game until you missed a back rank mate.

This is an overwhelming position for white. The black king is out in the open. You have your three major pieces and a knight available to attack the black king.
 
Re7+ was a very good start. It was okay to take your rook off your back rank to go for mate but then you snapped off the h7 pawn. Going after a pawn wasn't the right play. You needed to keep checking your opponent or simply let your own king have an escape square to stop the back rank mate of your king.
Artful_Chess_Dodger

The GUI on LiChess is better; however, the forum is better on Chess.com!