tygxc the fact that your argument that chess is a draw doesnt even depend on the rules of chess should be very obvious that it is flawed.
Think about it. Obviously the rules of chess define the game itself. However, perhaps you're missing the important context. MARattigan has made lots of spurious arguments about small potential differences in the rules regarding repeated moves (that obviously cannot affect whether it's drawn) and 50 or 75 moves rules etc, which can affect it. However, most sensible people aren't interested in 50 or 75 move rules and are only concerned with the inherent nature of chess as described by the movement of the pieces and the board size. In this context, things like 50 move and 75 move rules can be considered to be add-ons, which don't affect whether chess is inherently drawn. tygxc is without doubt a silly person indeed but regarding this, if this is the context he's talking about, he's right.
ngl the stuff with u and the rest of the squad is just who can be a bigger dingus over semantics.
you know as well as I do that I wasnt referring to just rules like the 50 move 'rule'
Where is that bum post? I can't find it.
[EDIT] Aha! I found it. #8518.