Chess will never be solved, here's why

Still better than some answers here...

Using ChatGPT is like using "poll the audience" on Who Wants to be a Millionaire...it's quite a bit preferable as a lifeline option to "phone a friend", unless your friend happens to have credentials in the subject matter. LLMs are decent at consensus answers that are not too specific on technical details and definitely don't require calculations. Math by public consensus gathering is just a horrible idea .

FR.

Will tygxc start using ChatGPT to push his points here?
I'm guessing no. Not quite his style.

i doubt it, chatgpt uses a lot of readily available info, and a lot of that info contradicts his claims.

tygxc can be exasperating - but only if one allows him to be.
Particularily irksome were his assertions like 'We don't care about the limits on the number of operations per second a computer can do! Its Nodes per second that matters!'
Reveals ----

LLMs
Large Language Models.

member when ju played all a china. she took the most common chosen move from alla the black entries. millions. each move. she wiped em out. a miniature. it was dum.

and a/o who feels AI is near the end of its parabolic uppy ?...is dum too. watch what happens in the next 10 years. its gonna scare u like chucky. wait...they killed him right ?...nvm. nite e/o L♥

Back on topic.

The ICCF World Championship Finals now are at 108 draws out of 108 games.

So we have 108 chains of moves that link the initial position to known drawn positions.
The linking is redundant: even if a few links were broken, there are backup lines.

So the 17 ICCF World Championship finalists and their computers are doing what GM Sveshnikov predicted: trace all openings to technical endgames and weakly solve Chess.

AI's upward parabolic trajectory?
I don't think it will stop.
Whether its chatgpt or whatever.

tygxc they are more on topic than you are.

On topic is when you address the fact that every person ive talked to with a math education at a college level or above can find the same fallacies in your arguments that ive pointed out to you.

its been months tygxc why arent you responding to that fact?

When are you addressing the fact that every person ive talked to with a math education at a college level or above can find the same fallacies in your arguments that ive pointed out to you. I gave them PLENTY of context to your posts, you cant claim I took them out of context.

Heck, when I come back with My PHD in a few years, I wouldnt be surprised if you STILL claimed to know math logic better than I, and everyone else.

I wouldn't be surprised either by that.
In fact I'd be mildly surprised if he didn't.
But an issue here is math 'illogic' ...
Illogic often dominates human activity.
And the psychological - not the logical.
And illogic in a situation often prevails.
Or survives when it shouldn't.

optimissed: makes a faulty argument and makes false claims about mathematics due to his lack of mathematical understanding (ex: he doesnt know what a mathematical object is)

me: points out his fallacies and how he's wrong

optimissed: you just dont understand what im talking about.

any substance you had is gone. im back to ignoring you until you have an actual argument

@12098

"when I come back with My PHD in a few years"
++ Yes, please come back in a few years.

Yet another falsehood by O.
Elroch and tygxc are not similiar and even O would know its obvious they're not.

Don't hold your breath.

Wow, 130+ pages of muted posts...surely that can't only be Optimissed yet again? Are we missing anyone else?

AI's in its very-VERY beginnings. and quant analysis is gonna be a dooperwowie. utilities. energy. medicine. just name it. IT. banking. me dn here at the bottom ?...i wont see it as much as how its gonna change those at the top. zinga yee !...imo. its gonna zolt efficiency like no one ever thought. bot like kismets gonna look sooo dum if u compare it today w/ tomorrow lol.

cant wait !!

Hi LUKEY !!...may ur never-ever run outta catnip lol !