the terms of "ultra weakly solved, weakly solved, strongly solved" are all well defined and require rigorous proof. most of the disagreement comes from the fact that people do not understand the terms properly, or do not understand the rigor required for the proof.
The terms were introduced by games theorists. They have no connection to "solving chess" since the so-called strong solution is known to be impossible, so what are you talking about?
You can't prove a definition, by the way. A definition is a descriptive meaning that is applied to a name.
This sounds like you think the relevant meaning is the vague imprecise one in common English (where words are defined based on other words which very often have imprecise meanings themselves). It is not. The relevant meaning is that of a definition in the mathematical sciences, based on axioms and other definitions that could in principle be processed by a computer in the same way as they are by a human reasoning about the subject.
A definition is an unambiguous description of an abstract entity (or property of such entities, etc.) that could in principle be implemented in a computer with complete clarity.
If you keep listening to Elroch, you are not going to learn a thing.
Says the guy who has failed to repair such failings in his own understanding.
You are not worth taking seriously, Elroch. You and I have had many differences of opinion and thay have all been founded on your inability to understand words when there are too many of them in a line for you to take in.
well then explain them well enough so that not only you understand it in your mind, but elroch and others as well. using long and complicated words may confuse some people so don’t go around insulting them, this just proves you want to argue with someone you already think of as lower than you
You seem to be saying that I'm indistinguishable from you but I take strong exception to such an accusation.
This is just part of your malady...to only be capable of seeing fault outside yourself.
Because you are at fault and Elroch is at fault. It isn't a big deal. Neither of you are very bright. You fall back on your very conservative reactions and opinions which are never to challenge authority and, well, so does Elroch in a slightly different manner. It means that you cannot understand anything you haven't been taught. I'm not losing sleep over it.