Chess will never be solved, here's why

Sort:
DiogenesDue
Optimissed wrote:

That's interesting. So according to you, everyone speaking here legitimately has only one purpose, which is to "debunk" tygxc.

Thanks for confirming what I already knew, although I also know it isn't entirely true, since some people defend ty, as I normally do. Only the trolls attack him but why do they do that? Do you know why? You're kind of troll police aren't you? Your job is to attack those who try to defend ty.

Let's unravel your contortions...

- Some people defend Tygxc besides yourself? Who are they?

- You don't agree with Tygxc either...you are here for one reason and one reason only, to argue with your perceived nemesis...that is, the amalgamated blob of accounts you have deluded yourself into thinking are one person who is out to get you. It's a paranoid reaction, one that gets worse over time.

There's no reason for you to be here, there's no reason for you to be expounding upon your "14 year" unilateral feud with Elroch, and there's no reason to be talking about other threads or their relative merit, especially since you've never posted a thread of note or value in your entire tenure here.

Alexeivich94
DiogenesDue wrote:
Optimissed wrote:

I don't think he's a very intelligent mathematican though. Anyone intelligent would be able to argue over things without getting personal but he's been incapable of it as long as I've known him, which is around 14 years.

I am good at debating. That means I can debate on subjects I don't fully understand provided they aren't described in opaque jargon which needs an interpreter. It means I can debate better than Elroch by a long way and when he finds himself losing an argument, no matter who it's against, he has always made personal attacks. platerafar is just one of the profiles he surrounds himself with. We don't know if he's real or an alt.

Basically, if he hadn't lost the argument with me, the trolls wouldn't be talking. Thay'd be somewhere else, bothering someone else but if E loses an argument, the trolls attack. It doesn't matter and no-one who is the least bit intelligent will be taken in by it. They can only convince people dimmer than they are. Same with Elroch.

Delusional.

You are decent at pontification, but *terrible* at debating (and incapable of discerning the difference), and people are here to debunk Tygxc. Your annoying posts are entirely incidental...but way to assume that everything is always about you .

You definitely do debate on subjects you don't fully understand though...I mean, it's pretty much a requirement for posting in your case.

"You definitely do debate on subjects you don't fully understand though...I mean, it's pretty much a requirement for posting in your case"

One should admit that this is the case for anybody regarding any topic with a level of complexity

DiogenesDue
Optimissed wrote:

I'm going to make you laugh, Dio, although I mentioned this a few years ago. About 16 years ago, I had the reputation of being the best debater in the English Language on Facebook. Not sure how many people were on facebook back then. Several millions?

You're delusional of course. Goes without saying for most people who've been around here a few years.

You've told everyone about your supposed Facebook "reputation" (read: self-given title) at least a half dozen times over the years. You just don't remember...which is more proof of your decline...or perhaps your ego is suffering at the moment and you feel some visceral need to mention it out of the blue again because you are feeling insecure.

DiogenesDue
Alexeivich94 wrote:

"You definitely do debate on subjects you don't fully understand though...I mean, it's pretty much a requirement for posting in your case"

One should admit that this is the case for anybody regarding any topic with a level of complexity

I used 'fully understand" because Optimissed said it...but it was tongue-in-cheek. He barely understands half the the topics he posts on.

mpaetz
Optimissed wrote:

I am good at debating. That means I can debate on subjects I don't fully understand provided they aren't described in opaque jargon which needs an interpreter.

Those of us who have read your posts on chess.com for years realize that you will endlessly "debate" about subjects you don't understand. However, inaccurate information, pointless diversions, paranoid conspiracy theories, repeated groundless boasting about your (and your family's) unparalleled intelligence, and personal insults toward those with opposing opinions aren't commonly considered to be traits a of good debater.

Feel free to reply with whatever condescending insults you wish.

PS--You do contribute positively sometimes and many times I agree with your conclusions, but the doubling (and tripling, and octupling) down on every unreasonable supposition is wearisome.

BigChessplayer665
Tekuila wrote:

I want to play people on my own level, not these 500 level people

Then beat them if your secretly 1200 then get to 1200 you aren't 1200 till you reach it

Ps:just cause u can beat someone 1000+ points above you doss not mean you do it consistently

BigChessplayer665
Tekuila wrote:

if you challenge me you will see... but oh... wait.. you don't want to lose your points I get it...

I don't really care plus there's unrated :/

BigChessplayer665
Tekuila wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Tekuila wrote:

I want to play people on my own level, not these 500 level people

Then beat them if your secretly 1200 then get to 1200 you aren't 1200 till you reach it

Ps:just cause u can beat someone 1000+ points above you doss not mean you do it consistently

if I have access to play 1000+ consistently then yes, will be easy

Not really... It takes a lot more than being able to beat them 1 game

BigChessplayer665
Tekuila wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Tekuila wrote:

I want to play people on my own level, not these 500 level people

Then beat them if your secretly 1200 then get to 1200 you aren't 1200 till you reach it

Ps:just cause u can beat someone 1000+ points above you doss not mean you do it consistently

if I have access to play 1000+ consistently then yes, will be easy

Yup you play in about 500-800 range

Continue improving maybe you'll get to 2000 one day...

Elroch
Optimissed wrote:

I'm going to make you laugh, Dio, although I mentioned this a few years ago. About 16 years ago, I had the reputation of being the best debater in the English Language on Facebook. Not sure how many people were on facebook back then. Several millions?

You're delusional of course. Goes without saying for most people who've been around here a few years.

That is a most amusing claim!

I presume there are no third parties to support it, no examples of the brilliant debates preserved, no record on the Internet of fame beyond a small group of acquaintances.

Am I wrong about any of those?

Elroch

If someone doesn't reply for a while, a highly likely reason is they are not here.

playerafar
Optimissed wrote:
Alexeivich94 wrote:
Optimissed wrote:

I don't think he's a very intelligent mathematican though. Anyone intelligent would be able to argue over things without getting personal but he's been incapable of it as long as I've known him, which is around 14 years.

Maybe it's just a bad temper

It used to be much worse than it is now. He used to go completely crazy in arguments, 10 years or more ago. Now he blocks everyone who argues with him from his threads. That means he can't argue with and insult anyone in his threads and he gets bored. So recently he's left his threads and ventured out, bringing his flock of trolls with him for protection.

I noticed he was insulting tygxc here, not just once but repeatedly. I can out-argue Elroch any time so I joined in. ty doesn't try to protect himself and as a result ppl think he's dim.

Optimissed never out-argues Elroch. Or anybody.
As usual Optimissed is lying again.
Optimissed trolls.

playerafar
mpaetz wrote:
Optimissed wrote:

I am good at debating. That means I can debate on subjects I don't fully understand provided they aren't described in opaque jargon which needs an interpreter.

Those of us who have read your posts on chess.com for years realize that you will endlessly "debate" about subjects you don't understand. However, inaccurate information, pointless diversions, paranoid conspiracy theories, repeated groundless boasting about your (and your family's) unparalleled intelligence, and personal insults toward those with opposing opinions aren't commonly considered to be traits a of good debater.

Feel free to reply with whatever condescending insults you wish.

PS--You do contribute positively sometimes and many times I agree with your conclusions, but the doubling (and tripling, and octupling) down on every unreasonable supposition is wearisome.

Even when he gets something right Optimissed finds a way to mess that up too.

Elroch

I think everyone is capable of improvement.

But some choose not to. And some don't agree with what improvement is.

[That first one includes me].

DiogenesDue
Doves-creek wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCyZ_y8wJiw so you're calling trump a ''commuter with a lowbrow sense of humor'' ?

Minus "commuter"...

DiogenesDue
Optimissed wrote:

I'm busy, a bit bored with working, my wife seems to be busy with something and you're one of those people who accuses his poor victims of being what you are, so reading what you're saying about yourself is funny.

I know you're feeling insecure and all that. I know your "ego is suffering". Never mind, you can't win them all. Just keep trying.

Lol. You can't even come with arguments of your own. Your brain constantly feeds you a diet of things it remembers other people saying...

Elroch
DiogenesDue wrote:
Doves-creek wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCyZ_y8wJiw so you're calling trump a ''commuter with a lowbrow sense of humor'' ?

Minus "commuter"...

Minus the sense of humour.

DiogenesDue
Optimissed wrote:
Doves-creek wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCyZ_y8wJiw so you're calling trump a ''commuter with a lowbrow sense of humor'' ?

I quite like him. He's amusing and fairly clever but a bit weird for a President maybe?? I think he'll get it. Such is the USA.

I'll bet you're big Farage fan, as well.

DiogenesDue
Doves-creek wrote:

nope, lol

You can read Optimissed's mind? Amazing.

MEGACHE3SE
Optimissed wrote:

About 16 years ago, I had the reputation of being the best debater in the English Language on Facebook. Not sure how many people were on facebook back then. Several millions?

At this point i dont think it's possible to caricature optimissed. LOL