I am good at debating. That means I can debate on subjects I don't fully understand provided they aren't described in opaque jargon which needs an interpreter.
Those of us who have read your posts on chess.com for years realize that you will endlessly "debate" about subjects you don't understand. However, inaccurate information, pointless diversions, paranoid conspiracy theories, repeated groundless boasting about your (and your family's) unparalleled intelligence, and personal insults toward those with opposing opinions aren't commonly considered to be traits a of good debater.
Feel free to reply with whatever condescending insults you wish.
PS--You do contribute positively sometimes and many times I agree with your conclusions, but the doubling (and tripling, and octupling) down on every unreasonable supposition is wearisome.
Even when he gets something right Optimissed finds a way to mess that up too.
I don't think he's a very intelligent mathematican though. Anyone intelligent would be able to argue over things without getting personal but he's been incapable of it as long as I've known him, which is around 14 years.
Maybe it's just a bad temper
It used to be much worse than it is now. He used to go completely crazy in arguments, 10 years or more ago. Now he blocks everyone who argues with him from his threads. That means he can't argue with and insult anyone in his threads and he gets bored. So recently he's left his threads and ventured out, bringing his flock of trolls with him for protection.
I noticed he was insulting tygxc here, not just once but repeatedly. I can out-argue Elroch any time so I joined in. ty doesn't try to protect himself and as a result ppl think he's dim.
Optimissed never out-argues Elroch. Or anybody.
As usual Optimissed is lying again.
Optimissed trolls.