Chess will never be solved, here's why

LMAO, i lose half my games and am low rated and these armchair keyboard warriors accuse me of cheating? Welcome to my block list

So you chose not to be nice hmf

You need to... Grow up!

Says the 15 or 16 year old troll?

I'm not 15-16 this is embarrassing

Says the 69+ year old troll

She's not

Your the one complaining lol

So you treat other badly they usually retaliate

Unless you don't know how human nature works (or part of it )

Not my fault your accusing people lol

I have pretty much proved you wrong. To my own satisfaction and to the satisfaction of people much cleverer than you are. I have given irrefutable arguments why a deductive solution for chess is impossible. I know you won't be able to refute what I wrote but neither will anyone else because what I wrote is accurate.

This means that the definitions you rely on are incorrect BECAUSE they are inapplicable. They are inapplicable due to the reasons I have given, as to why the solution looked for by the mathematics department here (such as it is ... it isn't very strong, no PhDs at all) is impossible to achieve.

Thie discussion regarding this subject is over and the best we have is tygxc's methodology with my suggestions incorporated. There's nothing else. Tough.

Nah the only one who's feeling sorry for themselves is you lol for now at least maybe hopefully that will change once you stop trolling random people (not even trolling that's actually harassment ) btw

I think you are because I'm starting to recognise you. I'm 73. You must have lost count during your previous incarnation here.

Anyway, you post like a 15 year old so why are you embarrassed?? Also I'm not trolling. The argument is over and any good mathematician would agree with me. I mean, good mathematician. The solution as looked for by the section here opposed to tygxc is impossible to achieve with any degree of certainty. There's no doubt about it and therefore the definitions of solving as given by the Combinational Game Theorists are inapplicable and merely dreams.

So close yet so far away

You don't have to believe me that im not 15🤣

Ik my age rather you think I'm a fifteen year old lol

False recognition becomes more common at advanced ages.

Yes at least we liberals admit that

I doubt you could even look yourself in the mirror and say "I messed up I trolled to much "

I expect it probably does because many people start to lose their faculties. However, it starts at different ages and progresses at different rates. There are some people precisely 11 years younger than me here who are without doubt very much further along the path.

There is one person we have seen very little of for the past two years or year and a half. The behavioural patterns are very similar and the emotional imbalance is identical. I could be wrong of course. We can all be wrong.

I like this comment

It shows everything about your erm special personality

So you try to be a better person I dunno 🤷

If chess cannot be solved strongly or weakly solved, then changing the definition does not solve it. If you could reason at all, you would understand this...but instead, you choose to posit a theory along the lines of "since we cannot accelerate to the speed of light, then we should just use the speed of sound instead, since that is achievable".

I trust that even you could grasp how feeble an argument this is, if you weren't primarily concerned with not losing face and pretending you are gifted somehow.

I'm pretty sure even the non-liberals would not be stoked to find out you are on their side. You seem a few scoops short of a milkshake.

...and I am duly stoked.

He's a sort of random comments troll.