Forums

Chess will never be solved, here's why

Sort:
playerafar
Thee_Ghostess_Lola wrote:

...so u didnt grow from it ?

better to lose weight usually.

Thee_Ghostess_Lola

i just wanna know if he learned a/t ...seeings that hes tryn so hard to sound smart...

playerafar
Thee_Ghostess_Lola wrote:

i just wanna know if he learned a/t ...seeings that hes tryn so hard to sound smart...

He thinks. Intelligence and smartness are results of thinking.
Results. Not 'trying to be'.
Lola - you would know the difference.
'would'.
But only if you consider that difference or don't forget about it.

power_9_the_people

Thinking can have significant results

Design thinking can have lots of significant results:

1. Reframing problems

2. Overcoming cognitive fixedness

3. Encouraging creativity 👏

Among others

power_9_the_people

Deep service design thinking could lead to addressing

which is the most important pain area that users need solution for

power_9_the_people

playerafar

Objective thinking with zero subjectivity ... does that happen 'across the board on a sustained basis' for anybody?
Apparently not.
Humans just aren't that perfect.
And people know that. Have 'funny' ways of expressing that.
Many regard computers as 'perfect' though.
But computers are extensions of human programming and decisions and policies - so computers and their activities aren't perfect either.
But that one is more of a paradox because people would argue a computer can't have subjectvity.