Forget about labels/types of tactics, and focus on the position.
How much time have you given yourself studying: "1001 chess exercises for beginners" before coming back to tactics trainer?
What do you mean by "studying"? I ask this because some people definition of "studying" is different from others. One person thinks studying a chess book means flying through it as fast as possible, while someone else will take months to study a book.
Are you looking at all Forcing Moves: Checks, Captures, Threats? And i mean ALL.
i recently slowed down my time on tactics trainer to work on a tactics book (1001 chess exercises for beginners) and i feel this book has really helped my tactical awareness in live games
however, my problems happen when i try the tactics trainer to see if i have gotten better and i find myself totally struggling; many problems dont really seem like “tactics problems” at all
i really try to apply im pruess’s strategy when solving the problems- ie quickly enough to rely on pattern recognition rather than spending 15 minutes on a problem- maybe getting an answer correct but not reinforcing patterns
my problem- 1400-1700 tactics trainer is maybe 1/3 are patterns and so many problems dont really feel like tactics
the problems snowball and i feel like many problems are a “lol- you thought this was a decoy sacrifice?...” “no way, my friend, this problem was specifically selected to trap those who thought it was a decoy sav but it is really move your king to safety...”
my issue is the mixed messaging from the problems themselves; by trying to be so effective and “like a real game” the trainer spreads itself so thin that i dont feel like i am training tactics
this is probably just a venting thread but i really find myself saying “wtf” more often than not