Computer analysis always correct?

Sometimes the computer analysis suggests moves that I don't understand or just don't like. Is the computer analysis on this website ever inaccurate?

I don't know if the computer analysis is significantly better as a paid member.  As a free member, it is pretty poor and useful only as a blundercheck.  Frequently it puts ?! against my moves and recommends alternatives I think look worse, so sometimes I check them in Houdini and Houdini prefers my move maybe 90% of the time. 

The CA is a little better for premium, but it's still useful mostly for missed tactics:

• Basic/Free: 1 Computer Analysis per week - with a search depth of 8 ply (estimated at 2000 strength)
• Gold:  2 Computer Analysis per week - with a search depth of 10 ply (estimated at 2200 strength)
• Platinum:  25 Computer Analysis per week - with a search depth of 14 ply (estimated at 2500 strength)
• Diamond: 100 Computer Analysis per week - with a search depth of 14 ply (estimated at 2500 strength)

no, I had games where it said it was a bad move butit directly led to a check mate two or three moves down the road-not sure.