Thanks, DKenney
Computer Analysis Question

Stockfish won't exactly 'tell' you that something is a blunder or whatever - you will look at moves individually, click the analyze button, and it will spit out (1) a numerical evaluation (2) what it considers the best move and (3) A string of moves that - if followed - will result in the numerical evaluation it generates.
A positive evaluation score means an advantage for white, negative for black, and the scores are done in terms of material (1.00 being a pawn up, 5.00 a rook, etc. - the usual score will be some cryptic number like -2.44).
So, basically, if you're playing white and the analysis says +.35 out of the opening and then drops to -.55 as soon as you make a particular move, that's an inaccuracy. If you do something that makes the evaluation change pretty dramatically - a 2 point swing or more - that's a mistake - and if you drop 3-5 points, that's a game-ending blunder.

My wife loves her Mac. I stay in a PC world because I use chess software daily. I blog chess, coach youth, and suffer occasional ambitions of breaking through into expert class.
One of my favorite chess engines is HIARCS. Alas, I cannot get the most up-to-date version. They release that for Mac. The PC vesion is always a little behind.
I signed up and played a few blitz games at lichess.org --play was awful but fun.
It allows for computer analysis of your games, with words such as "blunder" and so on. I found this helpful instead of just analytical lines.
Is there a software for Mac that helps analyze games this easily for the lower-rated player such as myself?
thanks....I am still stuck on playing against my Mephisto Milano stand alone dedicated computer. I love it. I think I better join the modern world, however! :)
I must say that Milano STILL finds some of the same moves that Magnus and Vishy play in the middlegame!
Does Shredder do this, and have tactics training, and so on?