It's not a stupid question at all... it is a really big question though.
You're also mixing up two topics...
Topic 1 is "bad bishops" -- friendly pawns interfere with the mobility of the bishop of the same color. So for example, If you have just a dark square bishop, you want your pawns on the light squares (in general... there are plenty of exceptions). This is most true when you are in an ending with same color bishops. Say both sides have DSBs and pawns... if your pawns are on the light squares, then your bishop moves around unimpeded by friendly pawns AND your pawns are immune from attack (he's got a DSB too, so he can't touch your pawns except with his king.) Meanwhile the enemy has his pawns on the Dark Squares.. his pawns are in the way of his Bishop AND are targets for your Bishop... many many games have been won on the basis of this simple, but crucial, difference in pawns.
Topic 2. Color complexes. Very often a player will have many of his pieces and pawns operating on one color, leaving him strong on that color, but weak on the opposite color... if you keep your eyes open you will see that time and time again, a winning attack occurs because although it looks, at first glance, like the defender has plenty of defensive resources, the defender is postioned to protect light squares and the attack is happening on the dark squares and the defender is helpless. I don't want to lecture on this topic since I'm just learning this myself
Often times one tries to trade off the oppenents light squared bishop for control of the light squares, and the dark bishop for the dark square control.
Question is: What does control over the light or dark squares mean? What should the strategy be after such trades? (ie Knight for Bishop or Bishop for bishop)
Does it mean placing your pawns/pieces on the color squares you are trying to take control or does it mean having your pawns/peices attacking the colored squares?
any help is greatly apprieciated. Somewhat stupid question but thanks.