Queens gambit declined
D4 is better than E4 and C4 and its also whatever works best for you

you dont even understand gambits with e4.
have you ever heard of "material isnt everything?"
I do understand material isn't everything I'll sack if I should I love the Queen's gambit it's one of my favorite openings look at my insights. the King's gambit isn't that bad if you have a line you wanna try it depends on the line and the level of chess. but some gambits are good if you are not careful they might be able to counter some random gambit if its a bad opening Vienna gambit queens gambit Evvan's gambit and a couple other gambits are good even the Englund gambit at some levels or the soller gambit I understand gambits just not all are good.

d4 is a relatively passive opening that leads to dynamic positional play. e4 contains lots of traps and is relatively riskier, but e4 yields plenty of wins too.
Going for a direct attack isn't always good if you want a great strong attack you need a lot of peices otherwise most wont be succesful attacking straight out of the opening is like putting a peice somewhere to attack some and then just having a pawn kick you away and defending there peice d4 has a stronger attack then the fried liver the fried liver is easily stopped but the the Jobava London isn't possible to stop the King's gambit is a disadvantage with an attack the Queen's gambit is and advantage with and attack the Sicilian is a great option for black from e4 the dutch isn't good against d4 though d4 takes the center by force theres not scandinavian for d4 there's a massive counterattack against th4 Englund gambit d4 isn't positional it is an attack too when you play e4 your goal is to attack the opponent with few pieces that can easily be stopped with d4 you can do that but cant be stopped if they make what you think is a mistake and you can bring thousands of peices in too with stuff like the London system and try to CRUSH THE CENTER THEN CRUSH THE GAME INTO SMITHERINES with a barely at all stopable here is the example comparison of the though mistake in in the fried liver and the true mistake jobava london
Fried Liver not working direct attack
Jobava London where the thought mistake is a mistake
fried liver stopped with one move all ideas and got a losing position white in end and jobava London worked out perfectly d4 just isn't often played as an attack but its attacks work better then e4s attack e4 is better in a positional game then attack like this one
when e4 was played positionally in that game there where better ideas for e4 then if you just start some random attack in the start that's a hard attack to stop positionally beats offensive d4 does that even better in that game they just made 2 mistake and couldn't find the best move now in that game your gonna win again positional beats attacking d4 is best at positional watch what d4 traps there are after the full london
this would be 2 700s playing but whatever there equal level but this time instead of a mating attack white developed a mating attack didn't win material checkmated instead at the 800 game of chess there where less mistakes but 800 ELO is better then 700 there white missed something an won anyway

e4 comes with it's own set of traps too!
And the actually reasonable ones:
(I'm only showing what happens if you fall for it for this one)
Now white has almost full control of the center.
Same thing for this one.
And don't forget about c4.
All because c4 happened.
you realize that these 5 random terrible traps give white a disadvantage and only 100-600 would fall for possibly almost every other player would never fall for them also every one of the traps you showed arent even book there just blunders the trap with the most advantage for white is the kings gambit still a disadvantage
wow kid you dont know what ur talking about
look at the vienna gambit
fried liver attack
d4 makes chess boring and nobody even falls for the queens gambit anymore
vienna gambit is sigma

e4 comes with it's own set of traps too!
And the actually reasonable ones:
(I'm only showing what happens if you fall for it for this one)
Now white has almost full control of the center.
Same thing for this one.
And don't forget about c4.
All because c4 happened.
you realize that these 5 random terrible traps give white a disadvantage and only 100-600 would fall for possibly almost every other player would never fall for them also every one of the traps you showed arent even book there just blunders the trap with the most advantage for white is the kings gambit still a disadvantage
wow kid you dont know what ur talking about
look at the vienna gambit
fried liver attack
d4 makes chess boring and nobody even falls for the queens gambit anymore
vienna gambit is sigma
fax bro

IVE BEEN SAYING THAT THE WHOLE TIME IM SAYING ITS STILL ONE OF THE BEST OPENINGS ITS NOT LIKE IM SAYING E4 IS BAD IF THATS YOUR FAVORITE OPENING PLAY THAT OPENING LOOK AT THE TITLE
^

e4 is a chad opening that us humans should play
that said, robots should resort to d4 as in theory it's better
d4 is a relatively passive opening that leads to dynamic positional play. e4 contains lots of traps and is relatively riskier, but e4 yields plenty of wins too.