D4 is better than E4 and C4 and its also whatever works best for you

Are you depending on the inconsistent Stockfish 17 engine available on chess.com? Is it the least effective version, or are you utilizing the Cloud or Game Review features? It's crucial to understand that the Stockfish 17 engine on chess.com often falls short and makes questionable decisions. For example, in one game, a move was labeled as brilliant by Game Review, yet it suggested a bishop move instead. Stockfish 17 is actually weaker than Stockfish 16, and if you’re using Game Review or Cloud, you might be accessing the Stockfish from the official site. Stockfish 17 on chess.com shows limited strategic understanding. During my evaluation of intricate puzzles with a single brilliant solution, even the official version from occasionally struggled to identify the correct move. It frequently suggested plays that did not result in material advantage, while the exceptional puzzle I was working on necessitated a precise rook sacrifice that it overlooked. I’m not sure about the programming behind it, but it clearly has limitations. Stockfish 17 on chess.com is the only engine that doesn’t fully utilize its potential, which is why I prefer Torch 2—it’s the most powerful engine on chess.com that truly maximizes its capabilities.

Also Magnus-Carlson-ME I meant to say Nf3 is the second best not f3 nobody plays f3.

e4: best by test

Can you present a solid argument? It seems you lack one, aside from the nonsensical comment you made. I, on the other hand, have a strong case. If you refer to my initial comment, you'll find several compelling points. The move D4 offers the greatest advantage and boasts a higher win rate compared to E4. Additionally, fewer players are familiar with D4, making it more challenging for Black to respond effectively. There are instances of the Jobava London that can confuse opponents, especially when compared to the Fried Liver variation. In the Fried Liver, playing D4 can lead to a favorable position, but in the Jobava London, that strategy doesn't apply. There are specific lines that can result in winning one, two, or even three pawns, ultimately transitioning into an endgame that secures a winning position.

oh boy oh boy, THE RUDY LOPEZ LES GO

maybe you just lack not using AI or yapping about the stupid Jobava

their both equal

Jobava sucks final

when OP first made this, the grammar sucked, he was stereotypical, and said e4 is blunder, and talked about a stupid meme. Now their point is better, but they are still stereotypical. Doesn't explain the upvotes lol, this should have at least -10.

Play what you like....no opening makes you better or worse.

yep

I used AI to rewrite my grammar it kept giving me recommendations and stuff you guys argued about my grammar that's why I used AI by the way I never said that you can't play what you like it's in the topic. The Jobava doesn't suck at all your tip doesn't actually work ChessAGC_YT The idea of the arguments I made is my idea by the way the AI just can't resist not rewriting it from average or good to excellent or whatever it wants. I don't think you have solid evidence that the Jobava London sucks if your tip of the fried liver doesn't work at all since I have talked to hundreds of ASCF rated players and USCF and a majority of them know why it doesn't work because it wont happen. if you're lucky it will happen if you play the Jobava London it has a 80% chance of working for its ideas if they don't stop the attack. I've seen people at my level not even knowing how to deal with it and being stupid because many don't know the opening and how to counter it so it has a better chance at working.

I'll change the start to my own words. ok

I changed it to my own words now, the text that stands untouched I either had know knowledge of how to recreate or was what I would've said.

what is blud yapping about

Rudy Lopez

C4 is still around +0.1 or +0.2 for white

The second game, white has an advantage after d4

real and hi motu