After watching building habits videos and videos like that and solving tactics on apps I blundered 10 times . Every move I play is a blunder to engine.
Difference between 300s and 600s rated players .
Sort:
Jun 6, 2022
0
#4
In the above game my opponent resigned but he was winning . I think I didn't blunder any major piece but engine shows me 9 points below.
How to understand what's going in the game DURING the game ?
There's absolutely no difference in my game in laat 5 years . In 2017 my rating was 550 here and now it's 570. And in this time I solved many puzzles , tactics , videos like logical chess move by move book ,
Even I played more than 5000 games here and li chess in this time period.
Jun 6, 2022
0
#5
Devill090 wrote:
After watching building habits videos and videos like that and solving tactics on apps I blundered 10 times . Every move I play is a blunder to engine.
Your developing well, but at the end you have to checkmate his king. Instead you just exchanged your strong attacking pieces away, e.g. exchaning Queens on move 16, when you could have calmly moved your Queen to c2, threatning a strong check on g6.
Jun 6, 2022
0
#6
Devill090 wrote:
In the above game my opponent resigned but he was winning . I think I didn't blunder any major piece but engine shows me 9 points below.
How to understand what's going in the game DURING the game ?
There's absolutely no difference in my game in laat 5 years . In 2017 my rating was 550 here and now it's 570. And in this time I solved many puzzles , tactics , videos like logical chess move by move book ,
Even I played more than 5000 games here and li chess in this time period.
In this game, the reason for the evaluation is that your King is very weak. You shouldn't have castled long, when you already moved the pawns away from your king, leaving it open to attacks.
Just put your king into a safe position, and look for opportunities to attack. If your up on development, don't let your opponents off the hook by giving away your strong pieces
Jun 6, 2022
0
#7
Blunder_Wizard wrote:
Devill090 wrote:
In the above game my opponent resigned but he was winning . I think I didn't blunder any major piece but engine shows me 9 points below.
How to understand what's going in the game DURING the game ?
There's absolutely no difference in my game in laat 5 years . In 2017 my rating was 550 here and now it's 570. And in this time I solved many puzzles , tactics , videos like logical chess move by move book ,
Even I played more than 5000 games here and li chess in this time period.
In this game, the reason for the evaluation is that your King is very weak. You shouldn't have castled long, when you already moved the pawns away from your king, leaving it open to attacks.
Just put your king into a safe position, and look for opportunities to attack. If your up on development, don't let your opponents off the hook by giving away your strong pieces
I traded equally. Like rook for rook , and knight for bishop. Most of the time I developed pieces but my opponent just move their pawn continusly and because of that I have to just move back my knight and bishop.
So, the whole purpose of development is defeated from my side. 😢
"Difference between 300s and 600s rated players"
++ The 300 rated blunder even more than the 600 rated.
"All games between players rated <1800 are decided on pieces being blundered on almost every move. So I guess the most useful thing is just do exercises -- which pieces can you capture in this particular position?" Carlsen on Twitter
Jun 6, 2022
0
#9
HappyWorldDaddy wrote:
Devill090 wrote:
After watching building habits videos and videos like that and solving tactics on apps I blundered 10 times . Every move I play is a blunder to engine.
I'm a 1300. I gotta say, the way you play is painfully relatable. I felt a sting watching that. Many of my games have gone that way; opponent moving pawns pointlessly as I flounder around helplessly. Somehow they gain a victory with a wing pawn or some other nonsense that drives me to resign. Been beaten by 800s with it. Madness!
Anyway, if you are stuck at 600 after 5000 games, and you wish to improve, I'd say watch some Youtube videos on openings for both black and white. Simply doing that dragged me up to the 1000's. Foundational strategy is essential at the lower ratings.
Also, play more Rapid 30 minute games - to improve you need to have extra time to analyse the position. Blitz simply does not allow for it.
My opponents don't play on the line of openings . I learnt london opening as I read somewhere its a good opening for beginners . But they just play pawns so I have to take back my bishops and loss finally.
Anyways thanks for answer.
Jun 6, 2022
0
#10
First you need to get to the point where the only blunders you make are from tactics, and not because you forgot your piece was somewhere or you just didn’t see it. So I’d recommend just keep playing games until those don’t happen as often then learn a basic opening but don’t spend too much time learning it. After that you can do lots and lots of puzzles and you should get to 1200 quickly
Jun 6, 2022
0
#11
tygxc wrote:
"All games between players rated <1800 are decided on pieces being blundered on almost every move. So I guess the most useful thing is just do exercises -- which pieces can you capture in this particular position?" Carlsen on Twitter
This quote is a lie, here is the real quote
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/stop-misquoting-carlsen
#13
Apparently he said
MC: "All games between beginners are decided on pieces being blundered on almost every move. So I guess the most useful thing is just do exercises -- which pieces can you capture in this particular position?
So there would have been 'beginners' instead of 'players rated < 1800'
I do not even know if that is true.
Maybe he said on twitter 'players rated < 1800' and cnn translated that to beginners to avoid jargon and make it understandable to non chess players
Even so, players rated 300 and rated 600 are beginners, so the quote applies either way.
I usually play with 300-400 rated players. After playing 1000 games here and 1000 games on li chess I reached near 600 . So, now players with above 600 play with me and seriously they play super good. Even after all things I do for example connect pawn , castle etc. they beat me without any problem.
It's tough.