* oh, and yes, come along, great ones, correct my grammar - I wrong 'then' instead of 'than', I do deserve it, go on -please do add your instructive comment. it is needed.
small example:
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/my-ideas
if someone can please tell me, what was his point in the first comment? ?!? what a horrible person, seriously...
I should report any person who is over 1900 because he commented on a post? I dont think so.
Right **
Reading the original post I assumed the OP would be a 600 guy . But he's 1690 . Bruh
don't think anybody takes somebody who hangs pieces seriously
2000s hang pieces. Oh yes... *shudders*
let me guess, you hang tons of pieces
yes
Reading the original post I assumed the OP would be a 600 guy . But he's 1690 . Bruh
Time to tilt U1900 so I dont get reported
I only complain when they say stupid crap like this
Otherwise, they just have more to offer in chess related discussions based on the simple fact that they're better than us at chess
And no one was insulting you in your example tbh
This might be an overreaction. And I don't think there is enough evidence that this high rated player thinks he is God.
However, I wouldn't call his reaction constructive, especially not the way it was phrased. It was rather dismissive . OP presented an idea, and why he thought it might work, looking for feedback like "hey that might work" or "I don't think that will work, because of ...". It wouldn't hurt the site if more people would be inclined to provide actual constructive feedback.
This might be an overreaction. And I don't think there is enough evidence that this high rated player thinks he is God.
However, I wouldn't call his reaction constructive, especially not the way it was phrased. It was rather dismissive . OP presented an idea, and why he thought it might work, looking for feedback like "hey that might work" or "I don't think that will work, because of ...". It wouldn't hurt the site if more people would be inclined to provide actual constructive feedback.
agreed
in the real world rich people's opinions count more than poor people, thats life buddy. get used to it. same thing with the chess community, higher rated players will always be more important.
When a high-rated player criticizes one of your ideas, you should first of all consider whether he might be perfectly correct.
There are some high-rated trolls on this site, sure. But there are also some very knowledgeable high-rated players who speak their minds plainly... if an idea is stupid, they'll call it stupid.
When a high-rated player criticizes one of your ideas, you should first of all consider whether he might be perfectly correct.
There are some high-rated trolls on this site, sure. But there are also some very knowledgeable high-rated players who speak their minds plainly... if an idea is stupid, they'll call it stupid.
...and you're one of them 😆
When a high-rated player criticizes one of your ideas, you should first of all consider whether he might be perfectly correct.
There are some high-rated trolls on this site, sure. But there are also some very knowledgeable high-rated players who speak their minds plainly... if an idea is stupid, they'll call it stupid.
...and you're one of them 😆
One of the high-rated trolls? Or one of the people who will tell you your idea is stupid?
Why not both?
When a high-rated player criticizes one of your ideas, you should first of all consider whether he might be perfectly correct.
There are some high-rated trolls on this site, sure. But there are also some very knowledgeable high-rated players who speak their minds plainly... if an idea is stupid, they'll call it stupid.
...and you're one of them 😆
One of the high-rated trolls? Or one of the people who will tell you your idea is stupid?
Why not both?
You, llama, and others are all both 😂
When a high-rated player criticizes one of your ideas, you should first of all consider whether he might be perfectly correct.
There are some high-rated trolls on this site, sure. But there are also some very knowledgeable high-rated players who speak their minds plainly... if an idea is stupid, they'll call it stupid.
...and you're one of them 😆
One of the high-rated trolls? Or one of the people who will tell you your idea is stupid?
Why not both?
You, llama, and others are all both 😂
Me, a troll?
That's a vile accuracy!
* oh, and yes, come along, great ones, correct my grammar - I wrong 'then' instead of 'than', I do deserve it, go on -please do add your instructive comment. it is needed.
small example:
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/my-ideas
if someone can please tell me, what was his point in the first comment? ?!? what a horrible person, seriously...
I don't think there is anything wrong with what he said. What were you expecting?
I want to address a problem in the forums here:
Someone opens a thread, some guys come out of Nowhere, bashing people... for no reason...
But - they're rating is 1900+, so they are God, and has the right to do anything. right? WRONG.
I strongly suggest starting to report them about Anything they say. They don't have any more rights here then a beginner rated 300 points... please do report them, - what they do is trolling, and it disturbs everybody, ruins the discussion, and make people afraid to share their opinions. enough with this weird tyranny of hooligans I say.
Godspeed.