do you believe in psycology or in good moves?

 i have observed that i get better results with black pieces because i play unsound openings, like latvian gambit, englund gambit, bongcloud attack  reversed...

So i don´t believe in the Fischer  quote.  Psycology is the key t0 provoke the blunder in our enemies .  It´s the only reason to understand why Anand lost the first games in the match against Carlsen.

what do you zink?

I believe in good positions (the thing after the moves). And I don't believe in having bad positions just to provoke blunders from the opponent.

Playing strong moves puts your opponent under pressure, and makes him more likely to make a weak move. However, I play quite psycologically. If I know my opponent as a great attacker, I won't go into a position where he has an attack, and I have the queenside pressure. I would rather go for the endgame, or a equal position where any attack is unsound. But I wouldn't play a directly bad move.