khayyamz 写道:
#The guy that started the topic You win blitz on time. I like rapid more.
the guy that started the topic is definitely a guy
does the gap between rapid and blitz decrease for most people as you go up?
Sort:
d4iscrazy 写道:
ice_cream_cake wrote:
d4iscrazy 写道:
This site is stupid lol, 5+5 and 5+2 are practically rapid lol
Lol
5+5 is super hard though
in what sense?
the player pool is stronger. I remember being like a 1500 rapid and struggling to maintain 1200 in 5+5. Then later at 1700 rapid i was struggling to even be 1500 in 5+5
Yes, the game quality is obviously better, but the player pool is also stronger for whatever reason, at least in my experience. Back in the day @Ultimate-trashtalker said so too.
I'd accept your 1+9 challenges but if it was unrated which i guess defeats the purpose 
You cant compare rapid and blitz ratings, they are 2 cometely different things
I rarely play rapid and my rapid rating is almost 200 over my blitz
medelpad wrote:
I rarely play rapid and my rapid rating is almost 200 over my blitz
Your dumb
ice_cream_cake wrote:
IronSteam1 wrote:
ice_cream_cake wrote:
Does that mean that as your rating increases your ability to see patterns quickly gives you more of an edge compared to weaker player? Idk, I'm just guessing.
I'd say that as your chess understanding increases, your need for longer time controls decreases. You become better at identifying (and/or recognizing) the needs of the position on first glance.
I see, that seems to make sense
It works both ways. As your chess understanding increases, there's also more to consider. Weak players tend to play fast and not everyone likes blitz. Most people probably think bullet isn't actually chess. I know I think that.
Magnus Carlsen 3233 blitz, 2896 rapid
https://www.chess.com/member/magnuscarlsen
DoYouLikeCurry je napisao/la:
I don’t know… all I know is I suck so hard at lower time formats. It makes no sense, as you’d think having ADHD would make me more suited to blitz and bullet but I just start to freeze up, I think.
1800 rapid, 1500 blitz. 300 points of difference! I don’t play bullet, really and my win percentage would suggest that I could get it up by playing it, but it doesn’t feel like real chess to me…
1800 rapid, 1500 blitz. 300 points of difference! I don’t play bullet, really and my win percentage would suggest that I could get it up by playing it, but it doesn’t feel like real chess to me…
"ll I know is I suck so hard at lower time formats"
Cheating detection at lower time is not working. Why? Because I suppose it's considered to be a lucky game. I watched a stream from GingerGM about how to go from 900 to 1000 elo rating, he lost 2 games and he is GM.
And what I notice when cheaters blunders early in the game, they start playing perfect chess.. Yesterday in a blitz game, a player blunder knight at 4 move , he got 92% precision game
I know that a lot of players when they piece up start playing very bad chess (just trade pieces and go to the end game, like me in this game), in this game, I blunder knights later on. But when I analyzed the game, It was a draw (just +1.12), even with my knight up (2 moves before I blunder a knight).. How is this even possible with 1400 elo Blitz player?
42, moves game, 1 blunder, 4=normal move, rest was top engine move.., 0 mistakes.
How he is not a cheater?. Even to lower down his precision he could take my bishop at the end of game he did not, he picked up a lesser move which was not a mistake.
Cheat detection is not working on lower time formats.
After blunders, perfect chess This is not detected.
#The guy that started the topic You win blitz on time. I like rapid more.