@ WellRead - you don't like it when you're called out and thrown to the FOX/MSNBC lions - I pity you Brother. I myself gladly gag on yet another heavenly scented toke ... and relieve my cough with a quick swallow of beautifullly crafted vodka.
Engine hash table usage
Sort:
Jul 4, 2011
0
#23
kneejo wrote:
But hey.. let's not hijack this thread.
This thread is totally about a table full of hash
WellRead wrote:
gorging on french toast and maple syrup like I am right now ... also ruins your ability to have normal intercourse.
WellRead wrote:
Wishbone:
Big difference. When I am gorging myself on french toast and maple syrup like I am right now and have a cigar when I'm finished with a little brandy, I am not breaking the law. When Tryst the Slugette has a pot pie, she is breaking the law. Pot also ruins your ability to have normal intercourse. Pot causes dementia and and hypertension. It hampers your capacity to function as a productive entity in a capitalist society.
Crushing centipedes,
Haywood
In the U.S., it was (sadly) once legal to own black people. Therefore the law is obviously perfect, no flaws, and should be followed and supported in all cases regardless of anything except the fact that it's the law.
Jul 4, 2011
0
#26
Wellread, I have one word for you: GLUTTONY. It's one of the seven deadly sins.
Jul 4, 2011
0
#28
wishiwonthatone wrote:
In the U.S., it was (sadly) once legal to own black people. Therefore the law is obviously perfect, no flaws, and should be followed and supported in all cases regardless of anything except the fact that it's the law.
Jul 4, 2011
0
#29
wishiwonthatone wrote:
In the U.S., it was (sadly) once legal to own black people. Therefore the law is obviously perfect, no flaws, and should be followed and supported in all cases regardless of anything except the fact that it's the law.
You are being sarcastic now, aren't you? :)
kneejo wrote:
wishiwonthatone wrote:
In the U.S., it was (sadly) once legal to own black people. Therefore the law is obviously perfect, no flaws, and should be followed and supported in all cases regardless of anything except the fact that it's the law.
You are being sarcastic now, aren't you? :)
brother please.... do I really need to explain that? The law is made by men/women. Both are fallible and make mistakes. The law is not perfect. Just because it's against the law doesn't make something wrong/right.
Jul 4, 2011
0
#31
wishiwonthatone wrote:
brother please.... do I really need to explain that?
No, it was a retorical question. That's why the smiley. I share your ideas about the law of man.
trysts wrote:
kneejo wrote:
@trysts would hash be considered cheating, if it improves play? That stuff is known to give one excellent concentration, albeit at the cost of missing alot of other things that go on around you. :) It is also proven that students who use it while learning something, and then again when the exame comes, it increases performance. From my experience, it offers easier access to long term memory, and the sub-concious.
nice
I've actually never had hash, it's just pot around these parts. Pot increases enjoyment, for sure, when I play chess. But, I would probably have to smoke it for a few weeks straight to get used to how much time I'm taking for a move. The "internal-time-consciousness" is usually a little off, from objective time, and before you know it you have 2 minutes left on the clock! So, I wouldn't say it increases performance, even after you get used to it. I would say it increases enjoyment
Your respiratory tract would find the experience to be harsher than pot ... or so I've heard. I think I could figure out how to make it, not that I would. If opportunity ever presents itself, remember that the THC content by volume is higher.
By the way, why is OP using four engines to figure out the best move? This guy is the reason my rating is so low. 
Jul 4, 2011
0
#34
electricpawn wrote:
Your respiratory tract would find the experience to be harsher than pot ... or so I've heard. I think I could figure out how to make it, not that I would. If opportunity ever presents itself, remember that the THC content by volume is higher.
This forum is turning into High Times I love it!!!
WellRead wrote:
..... No, you centipedes must be dealt with.
The foot,
Haywood
That's just hateful. I'm sorry for you.
Jul 4, 2011
0
#36
WellRead wrote:
I think you're being a little histrionic here. Comparing a lawbreaking lazy pothead to the institution of slavery is weak. The issues are incongruent and your argument is false. I know your kind like to lay around some inner city loft and listen to jazz and do some pot. If that was all there was to it, I'd say okay. But that's not the case. While you're all dubed up what happenswhen your little kid goes down the hallway to the neighbor's pitbull and gets shredded alive, and all you do while you're dubing is to sarcastically announce, "C'est la vie," while puffing on your dube. No, you centipedes must be dealt with.
The foot,
Haywood
{sarcasm mode} We are not centipedes, we are locusts;
"The fifth angel sounded his trumpet, and I saw a star that had fallen from the sky to the earth. The star was given the key to the shaft of the Abyss. When he opened the Abyss, smoke rose from it like the smoke from a gigantic furnace. The sun and sky were darkened by the smoke from the Abyss. And out of the smoke locusts came down upon the earth and were given power like that of scorpions of the earth. They were told not to harm the grass of the earth or any plant or tree, but only those people who did not have the seal of God on their foreheads. They were not given power to kill them, but only to torture them for five months. And the agony they suffered was like that of the sting of a scorpion when it strikes a man. During those days men will seek death, but will not find it; they will long to die, but death will elude them."(Revelation 9:1 to 6)
{/sarcasm mode}
Dude! Are you talking about Republicans?
Jul 4, 2011
0
#38
Nah, just adding to the confusion with something totally out of context. :) The end is not nigh yet, don't worry.
Oh but it is Kneejo ... it is
@Haywood: I think the laws of men are flawed, and the science of psychology is flawed. In both cases because they lack the integration of the idea of God. And please don't think that you know if I have to go through perdition. I'm fully aware that God is seeing my every-thing, but I also know His judgement about me is truthfull, and yours is not.
But hey.. let's not hijack this thread. The subjects we discuss here are against forum policy anyway.. (drugs, religion and politics)