Extremely talented player I came across. Simply superb.

Perhaps I was being sarcastic?

Infinite recursion!

Where is the engine analysis?

Although I don't use engine for post game analysis.

Well, as I said earlier I m kind of hobby player. I don't need chess engine.

Btw, u didn't reply my post??

As Ishan suggested PC use in post #6 why don't you do what the moderator asked you to? Blaming others for your failures suggests you're a real class act.

Breaking news: Now mating in one move is possible, using computer aid.

So, "many years" apparently means 1 and a half. "Extreme talent" is having the ability to spot simple mates in 1. As to how to improve your game - there's no hope, I suggest you try tic-tac-toe. Alternatively, you could grow up. Hopefully this will be educating for you.

in_prasad, you'd do well to learn some manners.

Untracking.

cool gamez

The three games reveal excellent piece coordination and a tactical strength that instantly punished inaccuracies.  True, your errors led to the mates, but he instantly found those errors, which is not so easy to do three straight games so quickly.  You are praising good play and while you go overboard in your mancrush, your praise of an opponent's play is refreshing around here with all these massive egos and condescension.  You took the time to post the games and didn't make excuses for your loses; rather, you sought to learn from them, so good for you, I applaud you; forget what the haters say, you're way above them in class.          

A mate in one!

Hehehe, is that as tough as a golf hole in one ?

none of this makes any sense. when did chess.com become myspace?

(also they were 10 minute no increment games and you both are likely below 2000 elo.....skittles......you know.....supposed to be fun?.....entertaining?......)

To all the people saying good games:-

How in the world could those games be cool or good or whatever. If you feel that, I am sure you need to learn something.

(No offense)-(No rudeness)

mnhsr wrote:

The three games reveal excellent piece coordination and a tactical strength that instantly punished inaccuracies.  True, your errors led to the mates, but he instantly found those errors, which is not so easy to do three straight games so quickly.  You are praising good play and while you go overboard in your mancrush, your praise of an opponent's play is refreshing around here with all these massive egos and condescension.  You took the time to post the games and didn't make excuses for your loses; rather, you sought to learn from them, so good for you, I applaud you; forget what the haters say, you're way above them in class.          

Oh! So if you see a mate in one, you're above all in class? What about chess?!

He's quite good at setting traps.

Yea, but, the thing is he falls for the traps if there are any; traps can be easily set by even very low rated patzers. I appreciate your comment Tristan/-

lol, you thought you were being clever?  What you were suggesting of your opponent was obvious of course.  Equally obvious was here is a person who is impressed by simple tactics.  There are many players who can see simple tactics (even in 1 minute games) no computer necessary.

Yep. Exactly!