Feminists would love chess as the waman is the most important piece.

Sort:
LeonSKennedy992

Idk why there aren't more feminists playing chess.

NotAfraid

as a matter of fact the king is the most important piece

Toohey_Dee

I don't think feminists would enjoy playing chess as the majority of the players are men.

LTwo
Lol, you think the king is a "waman"
mgx9600

Just an FYI: in chess, it is the common belief that the king is a woman trapped in a man's body.  The queen is the opposite.

batgirl

Is a waman like a shaman?

btw, one doesn't need to be female to be a feminist, nor does being female make one a feminist. 

mgx9600

HEre're the gender of the pieces commonly assigned in chess:

King, queen, as mentioned above.

Rook : straight male

Bishop: gay male if black; female for white

Knights: bi male on king side; female on queen.

Pawns: underage , not yet mature enough to self-identify orientation

 

mgx9600

So, as you can clearly see, the sexes are balanced on the chessboard.

JayeshSinhaChess

The most important piece is the King, the most powerful, yes that is the queen.

Doc_Detroit
zzzzzzzzzzzz.....
Luitpoldt

So, as you can clearly see, the sexes are balanced on the chessboard.

 

But since the bishops have to be male, because the Church does not allow female priests, and the knights, at least historically, were also all male, it seems as though the females are distinctly outnumbered on the board.

Bilbo21

The queen has to do all the work just to keep the king safe.

maathheus

the quenen has to do all the hard work, and the king usually stay hidden behind the pawn and do nothing. Sometimes the wueen sacrifeces herself to save the lazy king. I dont think the feminists would emjoy it.