Ziryab wrote:
dylanpthomas wrote:
Here are the irrefutable facts of the game I posted. I found it and went through the report.
At no point was I down in material, not sure why multiple people keep saying I was, that is false. We were even in material until move 19 when I went up +1. After move 20 I’m up +2. After move 26 I’m up +4. After move 39 I’m up +5.
People keep talking about my massive blunder. The computer recognizes it as a mistake, not a blunder. In that position it was +3.78 better for White (my opponent). Two moves after that, my opponent made an actual huge blunder and the position became +5.05 for me.
The end result is me with three passed pawns, I’m about to capture my opponents last pawn so that there is zero chance of promotion, the enemy king is stuck on the back rank, and I’m up an entire bishop which means I would be up six points.
For the last 12 to 15 moves of the game my opponent is just moving as quickly as possible to run my clock out because they know it’s over. After move 42 it was +11.3 for me. In the final position it says mate in 7 for black.
At no point was I down in material, not sure why multiple people keep saying I was, that is false. We were even in material until move 19 when I went up +1. After move 20 I’m up +2. After move 26 I’m up +4. After move 39 I’m up +5.
People keep talking about my massive blunder. The computer recognizes it as a mistake, not a blunder. In that position it was +3.78 better for White (my opponent). Two moves after that, my opponent made an actual huge blunder and the position became +5.05 for me.
The end result is me with three passed pawns, I’m about to capture my opponents last pawn so that there is zero chance of promotion, the enemy king is stuck on the back rank, and I’m up an entire bishop which means I would be up six points.
For the last 12 to 15 moves of the game my opponent is just moving as quickly as possible to run my clock out because they know it’s over. After move 42 it was +11.3 for me. In the final position it says mate in 7 for black.
This narrative is inconsistent with the evidence. On moves 24 and 25, you blundered twice. You went from 1:36 (52 seconds more that your opponent) to 0:20 (20 seconds less than your opponent) calculating these two blunders. You also went from +2.2 to -3.9 with these two moves.
That's the reason you lost on time. Too much time spent making bad moves.
He has a nice accuracy too .
Somehow you’re getting a different report than I am. Everything I stated in that comment is a fact, based on the report I went through yesterday.