Fritz or Chessbase?

Sort:
Avatar of sjt1985

I have been looking to improve my chess game using a computer program, but I don't know if I should go with Fritz or Chessbase.  Are they similar?  Do they have differences?  Does Fritz use Chessbase as it's database? 

Avatar of AquaMan

Firtz is great for recommending moves and analysing games and positions.  The engine moves pieces on the board.  It's also good for searching for games from megadatabases of master's games.  

Chessbase is great for searching games and arranging games and positions into databases, and keeping an number of boards and databases active at the same time.  It makes a great analysis board while playing correspondense chess.  You can also generate win/loss statistics and opening books and trees from any database, which I don't think you can do in Fritz.  When you want it, the engine can make recommendations via arrows on the board, algebraic notiation output of engine calculatons for next move (kabitzer), etc., but the engine doesn't actually move pieces.  You can turn all the hints and kabitzers off when you don't want them and they stay off.  I keep them always off and go to Fritz if I want move recommendations. 

The problem with Fritz as an analysis boad for correspondense chess is that the engine turns back on every time you load a new game or position or make significant modifications to the pgn in a game.  You have to keep turning it back off.  Ocassionally it's gonna make a move when you didn't want it to and give you a hint.  

If you can only buy one then probably Fritz.  An older version is fine.  I have Fritz 9 and like it.

If you can buy both, then I'd also recommend Chessbase 9 starter package. 

 


Avatar of likesforests

Fritz analyzes your games for blunders. Chessbase lets you compare your games to master games (What a shallow explanation of such amazing programs... oh well, check their web pages if you want detailed descriptions). They can be used indepedently or together. Near the beginning and end of your games, a database tends to be more useful. In the middle, an engine tends to be more useful.


Avatar of AquaMan
PerfectGent, good to know the engines stay off now unless you specifically turn them on.  Is that Fritz 11?
Avatar of Niven42

Chessbase Light comes with the Fritz 6 engine, as well as Tablebase, both of which are free.  It has an Opening Classification analyzer and reads PGN files off your hard drive, so it's pretty decent for being a free trial version.

Not sure what I would go with if I wanted to upgrade to a "paid" version.  I think it depends on what you want to do with the software, as some are good at analysis, while others are good at editing or creating game databases, while still others are nice to look at and have great options for making videos.  Chess.com has a lot of trial versions to look at, so be sure to check them all out before you shell out your cash.


Avatar of likesforests

Chessbase comes with an older Fritz engine but not the Fritz interface. The interface is what allows you to say, "I want Fritz to auto-annotate my game overnight." Since I almost always hand-annotate that's unimportant to me, but it's worth pointing out.