Game review changes are horrible

Sort:
Kaeldorn

Them guys need to understand that perpetual changes are not a goal by itself.

Martin_Stahl
Kaeldorn wrote:

Them guys need to understand that perpetual changes are not a goal by itself.

The whole goal is growing chess. That includes adding and/or modifying features that will aid that.

Kaeldorn
Martin_Stahl a écrit :
Kaeldorn wrote:

Them guys need to understand that perpetual changes are not a goal by itself.

The whole goal is growing chess. That includes adding and/or modifying features that will aid that.

But who said chess needs to grow? Do you think something good will have been achieved the day every person on the planet "finally" plays chess? I feel lucky you guys are not trying to grow ski or ice skating, I can't imagine the increase of snow and frost in Winter...

Kaeldorn

They are dangerous, these tenants of perpetual growth within a finite system...

Kaeldorn

Everybody knows about Google and how brilliant they are, how smart, skilled, efficient, bla bla bla.

Many years ago, I've been at the vanguard of exploration for new ways and methods to hack. It was the firsts steps of "social engineering", and the general public never heard of it. That type of hack has the perk, it does require absolutely no coding skills. It only takes patience, imagination, some luck, and some motivation.

One of the first major breaches in the security of email accounts that got identified and tested, is the famous "security question" created so one could recover their email account in case they'd forgot or lost the related recovery email account.

For some reason, when filling up the security question, many felt compeled to type the true answer to the question they picked, and to the question "Who's your favourite uncle?", they'd use the actual name of one of their uncles. They acted as if typing some fantasy answer (for right answer to give later) would be a crime, and that, because people tend to identify owners of websites to some lawfull authority of some sort, that would have the power to sue them in court, would they dare lie to it. Even software engineers fall for it...

And finding out the names of your relatives on the Internet, if the hacker knows your real name for any reason, is often very easy. The US phone book, for an example, is a goldmine for that task.

So, genius Google, in order to reduce the severity of that security breach, introduced a novelty: now you would have access to the security question, only if the account was not used in the past 24 hours.

Alas, the effort was noble, but actually generated a new security breach: now it became possible for anyone, any stranger, to check if you used your email account in the past 24 hours. And by doing so every day for a week or so, to know if you used that email account all the time, sometimes only, or never. Hence, one would know if it was worth the effort to try to crack it open. Valuable information indeed, for the hacker.

And this is how, when it comes to computers and informatics, very easily, smart turns out dumb.

You'd think they've learn the lesson after decades of trial and errors. But no, they never did, and they never will. They actually don't need to: we keep paying.

Martin_Stahl
Kaeldorn wrote:
Martin_Stahl a écrit :
Kaeldorn wrote:

Them guys need to understand that perpetual changes are not a goal by itself.

The whole goal is growing chess. That includes adding and/or modifying features that will aid that.

But who said chess needs to grow? Do you think something good will have been achieved the day every person on the planet "finally" plays chess?...

You may not agree with that desire but that's one of the site's goals.

Kaeldorn
Martin_Stahl a écrit :
Kaeldorn wrote:
Martin_Stahl a écrit :
Kaeldorn wrote:

Them guys need to understand that perpetual changes are not a goal by itself.

The whole goal is growing chess. That includes adding and/or modifying features that will aid that.

But who said chess needs to grow? Do you think something good will have been achieved the day every person on the planet "finally" plays chess?...

You may not agree with that desire but that's one of the site's goals.

And that's a goal that leads to nothing good. Just like the harmfull and unrealistic goal of perpetual economical growth that is right now killing us all through pollution, global warming, and ressources exhaustion.

MaxSaar

Fr

EasyJayChess

I would ask the developers to remember that the dark UI is essential for players who are low vision, that is, are vision-impaired. For low vision players, a light patch on the screen is absolutely blinding.

OskarJ2012

There was literally nothing wrong with game review

OskarJ2012

It's fun and learning

carlsen
OskarJ2012 wrote:

There was literally nothing wrong with game review, it's fun and learning

if you compare it to the old game review you would've understood what we were talking about.

if the new game review was the only game review that chess.com had, we wouldn't've blamed them.

OskarJ2012
KingOfBrilliancy wrote:
OskarJ2012 wrote:

There was literally nothing wrong with game review, it's fun and learning

if you compare it to the old game review you would've understood what we were talking about.

if the new game review was the only game review that chess.com had, we wouldn't've blamed them.

I forgot about the game review

Haven't played on this website for a long time

RWQFSFASXC2000
EwingKlipspringer wrote:

Skywalker!! We read your five brilliant passionate posts right in a row, all right on the money, my wife and I applauded!! We didn't miss what you wrote, way to go! That was seriously articulate expression!!

its the toxic kid 🗣️

RWQFSFASXC2000

at least im not toxic lol

RWQFSFASXC2000

I dont have a life

@ewingklipspringer whatever do u have a life? or are u just toxic and racist

Pawnstarshinz

The new game review doesn't always tell me my success (or more often, failure) rate for the various openings like it used to.

Doesn't it care about me any more?

As Regurgitator once said, I like your old stuff better than your new stuff.

Martin_Stahl
Pawnstarshinz wrote:

The new game review doesn't always tell me my success (or more often, failure) rate for the various openings like it used to.

Doesn't it care about me any more?

As Regurgitator once said, I like your old stuff better than your new stuff.

That should still show on the last book move but you may need to scroll the coach speech

Lochnagar

Is there an alternative to chess.com that has some sort of game review like there used to be on here? This one has been dumbed down to the point of being near useless, but I did find the previous version to be both useful and entertaining.

UncleSteven2000

Hello, the new update is absolutely awful. Please put the review back to the previous version. I cannot use this review and I will be canceling my subscription if it remains this way.