never played more than 20 at a time...! If you play more, you start to not care whether you win or loose & you forget who your opponents are...
Games
Sort:
What is the best chess software out there today? I am a novice player but looking to get better. The daily puzzle on chess.com is fun but I am mostly moving by trial and error and not really looking at a strategies. Any advice is appreciated.
It was not between me and her it was between Kingchild and Rich
CzarWithinMoons wrote:
BTW what was that catfight between kingchild and FVC123 about? It seemed to come out of nowhere. And did someone say something about hundreds of people dying or something?
If you really want to know,go to kingchild's home page and look under -Madrid Plane Crash-and you'll see the insult left by baby -rich-!
CzarWithinMoons wrote:
kingchild wrote:
Bullshit Thanks, I was just about to by chess.com accounts for my young children, but forget it now.
Sir,with all due respests that I should give you,look up bullshit in the dictionary and then you mignt see that it is totally inofensive,regards,Gabriel!Ps,let the children play,thank you!
Thank you thegabo3 I will look and see what was said.
Do bro,then you'll understand her heart break!
CzarWithinMoons wrote:
I wonder what baby rich said... anyway, thats that thread, this is this thread. Lets keep this one all about me and not incorporate horror stories and namecalling and foul language and mudslinging and planes and countries and people and anecdotes and irrelevant comments and relevant comments and pictures and words and thoughts.
The innocent man that you are squire,without words there would not be treads!
True there would not be.
Thank you bro for your understanding,
!
Hey no problem bu tlets talk about me too lol
Ok,I love you bro,happy,lol,
!
Lol not like that i mean just general discussion.
Ok,you start and I'll continue!
Ok coll what do you do for a living?
I'm a dog handler and trainer,security buisness and all that and you?
And we love you to baby,!
Lmao i agree whole heartedly we do love you.
dmeng wrote:
joly wrote:
Although, if I understand this discussion correctly, no person has ever achieved a rating of 10,000, CzarWithinMoons was able to find 1,000,000 million people with 10,000 rating willing and able to play him/her over the board simultaneously.
Despite the logistics of setting up 1,000,000 chess boards and moving between each under strict time controls, CzarWithinMoons, a most superior athlete, was able to best all contenders.
I, for one, believe this story - after all, what is the incentive to lie.
However, my question is to the technical naysayers - why is it not possible to have a rating over 3,000? if the ratings are a prediction of the result, why would they not be uncapped (or does 3,000 mean a 100% chance of beating absolutely anyone)?
There is an incentive to lie. It's called a boast.
As it is, I highly doubt FIDE and its subordinate organizations can even cough up a million people with ratings over 2000, let alone 10000. As it is, even the fastest computers today can't break 3000 ELO for any extended period of time.
On top of that, if you spent 1 second per move, that's 1 million seconds to make a move in each game. That's almost 12 days. If each game lasts on average 40 moves, we're talking over 30 months of playing 24/7, and that's still assuming that each side takes 1 second per move. If CzarWithinMoons were to spend a slightly more realistic amount of 16 hours a day playing, that's still about 4 years to play 1 million people while taking just 1 second per move.
Thanks Dmeng, you make some very good points. However, I have found a number of fatal flaws in your reasoning.
First, you note that playing at 1 second per move, CzarWithinMoons would have taken 12 days to make a move in each and every game. However, CzarWithinMoons has already told us that all games were played at a time control of 5:3. Therefore, CzarWithinMoons must have been playing considerably faster than 1 second per move in order to stay within the time limits (so your assumption is plainly wrong).
Second, you note that with an average of 40 moves per game (and based on your erroneous assumption regarding time-per-move), it would take 30 months of continuous play to complete all games. However, I have conducted some emperical research (on this site) and have discovered that CzarWithinMoons only averages 26 moves per game. This is considerably less than your assumed 40, and further explains how CzarWithinMoons was able to win all one million games against the Super-GMs.
Cheers