Does anyone else out there get totally INFURIATED playing Blitz?

Sort:
Avatar of AtaChess68
To answer your direct question: no it doesn’t infuriate me.

But the 10/0 from blitz thing bugs me too. My blitz rating is 200 lower then my rapid and I am not able to close the gap. And believe me, I try :-)
Avatar of ck120

Well, I'm still playing 10+0, as my connect is bad. But last month I only played several games, as there are a lot of cheaters. There is about a half of a month I never played a game, but my rate was up, about 100 points. As these cheaters were found and banned by chess.com, chess.com backed these points to me.

I almost cannot bear anymore. I heard that the problem about cheater is forbidden in the forum so I would not complain more. So, maybe Blitz is good, as it is harder to cheat in blitz, you can fully enjoy a true game.

Avatar of llama47

No matter the time control, proper pacing counts for a lot.

"My opponent played fast and bad and won in the end"

Well yeah, that was their plan from the beginning.

I know how you feel, we've all felt that way before, but also if you want to play a longer game then pick a longer time control. Don't play at a 25-30 move pace then complain that you lost.

Avatar of TimofeiVaRo

Hello evrybody. Im a new player in Chess.com! Can anyone teach me how to play ches plz?

 

Avatar of llama47
TimofeiMV wrote:

Hello evrybody. Im a new player in Chess.com! Can anyone teach me how to play ches plz?

 

https://www.chess.com/lessons

Avatar of TimofeiVaRo
ChessSakura написал:

[RU] Задачи и учиться - кликни туда, и найдёшь крутые функции

спасибо! А ты давно играешь в шахматы?

Avatar of TimofeiVaRo
ChessSakura написал:

Но зато уже прогресс (2 разряд)

не плохо! а ты где-то тренируешься шахматам или ты так-любитель?

Avatar of TimofeiVaRo
ChessSakura написал:
TimofeiMV написал:
ChessSakura написал:

Но зато уже прогресс (2 разряд)

не плохо! а ты где-то тренируешься шахматам или ты так-любитель?

Учитель - гроссмейстер, но уроки редко, а так самоучка)

Ясно. Вот меня пару лет тренировал мужик (мб и тебя тоже тренировал, он обычно в казахстане тренирует) и у него был сын. И этот сын сыграл в ничью с Карповым (вроде так пишется)

Avatar of giant_of_style

First of all I really like 10 mins rating is separated to rapid. I wish chess.com will have classical rating let's say 30 min default. In blitz, yes I notice players really got very strong. Before I never go down from 2000. Now I am only around 1900. I do not know why. 

Avatar of snoozyman
Blitz and bullet chess is poop 💩
Avatar of xor_eax_eax05
PolarBearAttakk wrote:
ChrisZifo wrote:

Since they removed 10/0 from Blitz I have been trying the 3/2 and it drives me crazy. I really got to stop playing. I am rated 1700+ on slower time controls but for some reason I cant get above 1550 on this new Blitz. The most annoying thing is that I come up against players who have no idea what they are doing rated 1400-1600. They just play the weirdest openings. 

If they have no idea what they are doing, then you clearly have even less of an idea than they do as they are beating you, lol. Chess is a not a game of luck. If you're losing you're being outplayed.

 He never claimed it was a game of luck or that he had not been outplayed. You should put down the chess books and go pick a book about reading comprehension - you may develop a skill or two other than pushing pawns forward on a board.

Avatar of TimofeiVaRo
ChessSakura написал:

Екатерина Должикова, может знаешь

не, не слышал

Avatar of xor_eax_eax05
PolarBearAttakk wrote:
xor_eax_eax05 wrote:
PolarBearAttakk wrote:
ChrisZifo wrote:

Since they removed 10/0 from Blitz I have been trying the 3/2 and it drives me crazy. I really got to stop playing. I am rated 1700+ on slower time controls but for some reason I cant get above 1550 on this new Blitz. The most annoying thing is that I come up against players who have no idea what they are doing rated 1400-1600. They just play the weirdest openings. 

If they have no idea what they are doing, then you clearly have even less of an idea than they do as they are beating you, lol. Chess is a not a game of luck. If you're losing you're being outplayed.

 He never claimed it was a game of luck or that he had not been outplayed. You should put down the chess books and go pick a book about reading comprehension - you may develop a skill or two other than pushing pawns forward on a board.

 

No that's exactly what he claimed. Go back and re-read his post over again a few times until you are able to comprehend this. And he doesn't need to "claim that he was outplayed", nor that he said that he was. I'm the one who said he's being outplayed. And that's not a claim nor an opinion. That's a matter of objective fact!

Just becuase you're too dumb to learn how to play chess, it doesn't mean you're good at other things. If anything, it tends to be the other way around. The top players in every chess club are those with demonstrated high intelligence and ability in other areas. The lowest rated are guys like you who work at Walmart or unload trailers for a living. I'm very good at a great many things other than chess. I'm sorry that you're frustrated because you suck at your hobbies and everything else that you do.

 Ok, quote the part of the text in the OP where it was claimed it was a game of luck.

Avatar of TheDusty
snoozyman napisał:
Blitz and bullet chess is poop 💩

+

Avatar of TimofeiVaRo

Guys, u know why my chat in the game time is off? How can I switch it on? I activated the account tho.

Avatar of xor_eax_eax05

 You can't quote it because there is none, and you are trying to deviate attention from your failing to understand a simple forum post. The OP never claimed he was losing by luck. He just claimed he was infuriated by losing certain games at blitz.

 

 If you put down your chess book for a while, and go pick up a dictionary, do look up the meaning of the word "infuriate". Spoiler alert: it does not mean "luck". 

Avatar of xor_eax_eax05
PolarBearAttakk wrote:
 

Just as you're not bright enough to be able to get to a level in chess that isn't embarassing, you aren't capable of learning how to read and comprehend English.

Ah the irony. 2091 ELO in online chess, 500 elo in life. Typical.

Avatar of NiallPG
.
Avatar of xor_eax_eax05
PolarBearAttakk wrote:
xor_eax_eax05 wrote:
PolarBearAttakk wrote:
 

Just as you're not bright enough to be able to get to a level in chess that isn't embarassing, you aren't capable of learning how to read and comprehend English.

Ah the irony. 2109 ELO in online chess, 500 elo in life. Typical.

You continue to demonstrate that your pathologically low IQ doesn't just manifest itself in your inability to learn how to play chess, but in every other aspect of life as well. You're the one who isn't even capable of learning how to read and comprehend English at the level of an elementary school student. And I'm not 2109 in online chess. I'm 2353. You can't even get your rating to 1100, LMAO! If it wasn't for the server doing it for you, you wouldn't be able to figure out how to set up the pieces! I pity you little fella!

Why are u quoting my post before I edited it? That's a new low, even for you. At least I can recognise a typo and fix it. You on the other hand, didn't, because you actually think the word is spelt "embarassing". And yes, it's not 2109, it's even lower, 2091. xD

Still, the 500 from my comment was not a typo. I really meant 500.

Avatar of congrandolor

It happens. What gets me angry the most:

  • You join a 3+2 arena and win some games, then a 800 guy crushes you and you lose all the elo you had gained and more
  • The guy plays h6 g6 f6 e6 d6 in the opening. By move 10you are completely winning. Then he starts to play the best moves and you lose
  • You manage to play a decent game against a guy 200 or 300 points stronger. You outplay him, you are feeling great... then you blunder your queen or mate in 1, or worst, you stalemate him!