Why Does Chess.com Keep Pairing Me With People 200-300 Points Lower Game After Game??

Sort:
Avatar of Crewmate11

Avatar of JamesColeman

The seek graph settings thing only dictates the level of seeks that you can view.

It doesn't affect who can actually accept your seek.

Avatar of JamesColeman

This is the thing that dictates the rating parameters of the people that can accept your seeks.

Avatar of Theimmortalpatzer01
JamesColeman wrote:

 

This is the thing that dictates the rating parameters of the people that can accept your seeks.

Ok. I found a similar menu in the "custom game" window. Is that the same thing? I'm new here so I'm still finding my way around. Thanks!

Avatar of JamesColeman

Yeah mate, exactly the same thing. No problem.

Avatar of Theimmortalpatzer01
JamesColeman wrote:

Yeah mate, exactly the same thing. No problem.

Nice! I'll give that a try. Thanks! 

Avatar of Crewmate11
JamesColeman wrote:

 

This is the thing that dictates the rating parameters of the people that can accept your seeks.

Oh ok. I was still close but thanks for the  conformation

Avatar of Crewmate11
Theimmortalpatzer01 wrote:
JamesColeman wrote:

 

This is the thing that dictates the rating parameters of the people that can accept your seeks.

Ok. I found a similar menu in the "custom game" window. Is that the same thing? I'm new here so I'm still finding my way around. Thanks!

Yep same thing

Avatar of Theimmortalpatzer01
Crewmate11 wrote:
JamesColeman wrote:

 

This is the thing that dictates the rating parameters of the people that can accept your seeks.

Oh ok. I was still close but thanks for the  conformation

Thanks for helping out! Maybe we can both get to our rightful ratings happy.png 

Avatar of Theimmortalpatzer01

I decided to try out my new knowledge just now. It worked. But the pairing took about 1 full minute then I got a 2000+ opponent. I'm tired of this. Chess.com needs to 1) fix their rating distribution which is insanely lopsided to the lower end, 2) fix the pairing issue if they want more subs, and 3) do their job to address the insane amount of cheaters.

1732 blitz rating = 96.1 percentile. What a joke! 

I never have any of these problems on l.ichess. I'll try chess.24 next. I can't imagine there is a worst site than chess.com to play chess.  

Bye chess.com!!! 

Avatar of Crewmate11
Theimmortalpatzer01 wrote:

I decided to try out my new knowledge just now. It worked. But the pairing took about 1 full minute then I got a 2000+ opponent. I'm tired of this. Chess.com needs to 1) fix their rating distribution which is insanely lopsided to the lower end, 2) fix the pairing issue if they want more subs, and 3) do their job to address the insane amount of cheaters.

1732 blitz rating = 96.1 percentile. What a joke! 

I never have any of these problems on l.ichess. I'll try chess.24 next. I can't imagine there is the worst site than chess.com to play chess.  

Bye, chess.com!!! 

I understand why your annoyed but "worst site ever" is a tad harsh. It tries it's best and sometimes lots of people won't be online. Please give chess.com another chance. I bet won't find better anywhere. It's top-rated by multiple browsers and an amazing site. So if you do find another site, hardly anyone else will be on it. tear.png  pleading eyes?

Avatar of Crewmate11
speeduptheserver wrote:

It's one of many flaws on this site. Even worse, during periods of lag, your score is unfairly depressed then you're stuck in a lower rating pool which just makes it worse.

  1. you are all the most horrid people I have ever met. I hope you have a bad time trying to find a better site (because you will).
  2. What you need to think about is the fact that another site will have just as much lag unless you change your wifi which you could do while staying on chess.com.
  3. I am going to report you and get chess.com to convince you if I can't.
Avatar of aviation18

oh

Avatar of nTzT
Theimmortalpatzer01 wrote:

I decided to try out my new knowledge just now. It worked. But the pairing took about 1 full minute then I got a 2000+ opponent. I'm tired of this. Chess.com needs to 1) fix their rating distribution which is insanely lopsided to the lower end, 2) fix the pairing issue if they want more subs, and 3) do their job to address the insane amount of cheaters.

1732 blitz rating = 96.1 percentile. What a joke! 

I never have any of these problems on l.ichess. I'll try chess.24 next. I can't imagine there is a worst site than chess.com to play chess.  

Bye chess.com!!! 

Just leave already, no one cares. Goodbye!
Your delusions aren't welcome here anyway.

Avatar of Theimmortalpatzer01
nTzT wrote:
Theimmortalpatzer01 wrote:

I decided to try out my new knowledge just now. It worked. But the pairing took about 1 full minute then I got a 2000+ opponent. I'm tired of this. Chess.com needs to 1) fix their rating distribution which is insanely lopsided to the lower end, 2) fix the pairing issue if they want more subs, and 3) do their job to address the insane amount of cheaters.

1732 blitz rating = 96.1 percentile. What a joke! 

I never have any of these problems on l.ichess. I'll try chess.24 next. I can't imagine there is a worst site than chess.com to play chess.  

Bye chess.com!!! 

Just leave already, no one cares. Goodbye!
Your delusions aren't welcome here anyway.

Thanks for the heads up you corporate shill. I opened this account to follow certain titled players that are primarily chesscom users and that's what I intend to do. 

But hey, if you don't like it feel free to leave this thread as well. You're not welcome on this thread anyway! 

Avatar of TarunBeast

Well its true !!

Avatar of uglymuafugga

I've got a login but I've never been a member. I just like to play Blitz chess. I've never had the problem with ratings-matching that you describe. 

One time, I inadvertently clicked an (undesired) option and it followed me for my next two logins. After I cleared the cookie file, it stopped. Have you tried clearing cookies? 

Avatar of nTzT
Theimmortalpatzer01 wrote:
nTzT wrote:
Theimmortalpatzer01 wrote:

I decided to try out my new knowledge just now. It worked. But the pairing took about 1 full minute then I got a 2000+ opponent. I'm tired of this. Chess.com needs to 1) fix their rating distribution which is insanely lopsided to the lower end, 2) fix the pairing issue if they want more subs, and 3) do their job to address the insane amount of cheaters.

1732 blitz rating = 96.1 percentile. What a joke! 

I never have any of these problems on l.ichess. I'll try chess.24 next. I can't imagine there is a worst site than chess.com to play chess.  

Bye chess.com!!! 

Just leave already, no one cares. Goodbye!
Your delusions aren't welcome here anyway.

Thanks for the heads up you corporate shill. I opened this account to follow certain titled players that are primarily chesscom users and that's what I intend to do. 

But hey, if you don't like it feel free to leave this thread as well. You're not welcome on this thread anyway! 

Why haven't you left yet?

Avatar of Theimmortalpatzer01
nTzT wrote:
Theimmortalpatzer01 wrote:
nTzT wrote:
Theimmortalpatzer01 wrote:

I decided to try out my new knowledge just now. It worked. But the pairing took about 1 full minute then I got a 2000+ opponent. I'm tired of this. Chess.com needs to 1) fix their rating distribution which is insanely lopsided to the lower end, 2) fix the pairing issue if they want more subs, and 3) do their job to address the insane amount of cheaters.

1732 blitz rating = 96.1 percentile. What a joke! 

I never have any of these problems on l.ichess. I'll try chess.24 next. I can't imagine there is a worst site than chess.com to play chess.  

Bye chess.com!!! 

Just leave already, no one cares. Goodbye!
Your delusions aren't welcome here anyway.

Thanks for the heads up you corporate shill. I opened this account to follow certain titled players that are primarily chesscom users and that's what I intend to do. 

But hey, if you don't like it feel free to leave this thread as well. You're not welcome on this thread anyway! 

Why haven't you left yet?

Go harass someone else. BLOCKED! 

Avatar of Crewmate11
nTzT wrote:
Theimmortalpatzer01 wrote:

I decided to try out my new knowledge just now. It worked. But the pairing took about 1 full minute then I got a 2000+ opponent. I'm tired of this. Chess.com needs to 1) fix their rating distribution which is insanely lopsided to the lower end, 2) fix the pairing issue if they want more subs, and 3) do their job to address the insane amount of cheaters.

1732 blitz rating = 96.1 percentile. What a joke! 

I never have any of these problems on l.ichess. I'll try chess.24 next. I can't imagine there is a worst site than chess.com to play chess.  

Bye chess.com!!! 

Just leave already, no one cares. Goodbye!
Your delusions aren't welcome here anyway.

good point. they should just leave and get out.