Ah and please tell me if you like the analysis of my game above in this thread. Your opinion means a lot to me. See ya.
Brilliant!!!!!!!!!
I like the way you type!
Ah and please tell me if you like the analysis of my game above in this thread. Your opinion means a lot to me. See ya.
Brilliant!!!!!!!!!
I like the way you type!
Ah and please tell me if you like the analysis of my game above in this thread. Your opinion means a lot to me. See ya.
Brilliant!!!!!!!!!
I like the way you type!
Thanks! Hope you found the game instructive.
One question Sexy....
Do you analyse 960 games?
Yes, of course. Although I cant give you any opening tips then :D .
>to be FM one needs 2300. CM and NM are not fide recognized.
imo CM NM WFM s are not real master, they're on the run to be.
>if anyone wants to be anonymous, they have complete right. we cannot force them to reveal their identity.
>on the other hand, if you find someone cheating and have proof - you shouldn't post them in forums. rather, you should inform that to mods.
CM IS a Fide sanctioned title.
>to be FM one needs 2300. CM and NM are not fide recognized.
imo CM NM WFM s are not real master, they're on the run to be.
>if anyone wants to be anonymous, they have complete right. we cannot force them to reveal their identity.
>on the other hand, if you find someone cheating and have proof - you shouldn't post them in forums. rather, you should inform that to mods.
CM IS a Fide sanctioned title.
yes it is and normally CM is 2100 and NM 2200.
Ah and please tell me if you like the analysis of my game above in this thread. Your opinion means a lot to me. See ya.
My opinion is that you simply state facts never lines of play and this i mean by offering a plan for the game on either side and explaining what the opening is all about.Lacks depth for the first 10 moves or so and nothing more there after. I want to know why I play a move and not a qualitative assessement of the move already played. I want to know the what to go for and why
>to be FM one needs 2300. CM and NM are not fide recognized.
imo CM NM WFM s are not real master, they're on the run to be.
>if anyone wants to be anonymous, they have complete right. we cannot force them to reveal their identity.
>on the other hand, if you find someone cheating and have proof - you shouldn't post them in forums. rather, you should inform that to mods.
CM IS a Fide sanctioned title.
yes it is and normally CM is 2100 and NM 2200.
No, CM is 2200. There is no FIDE NM title. (See FIDE Title Regulations.)
I don't know why people are being so harsh on this guy (or girl?), he's just trying to help others out, I analized his/her game and in my opinion he/she plays well, maybe not top 8 worldwide level but still we are here to learn!
If you wish I would like to play with you and get advice as I am a novice as of yet. You can analize my last games if you want.
@Danielv16 : no problem, just be warned that this is most probably a (very) average player, playing the master by using an engine, and trying to make sense of the engine moves.
You could as well use an engine yourself and try make sense of what the engine suggests, which would already have more educational value.
The pseudo-analysis posted above is just a case in point, and clearly isn't the product of a titled player, to put it politely...
Hicetnunc, would you mind seeing that Sexy-Sunshine's blitz is rating 2115? Using an engine for blitz, it is insanely impropable that she would get a rating that high. Most blitz engines cannot perform that well at this point. If I am wrong, I would like proof, such as a link. Just beig the devil's advocate here. Thanks a ton!
-Whammerist
Again, I am not accusing anyone, but with 180 seconds, it is entirely conceivable that one might consult the engine quite frequently.
Why ? Using an engine allows you to get as high a rating as you wish.
I trust chess events which happen OTB.
Real title, FIDE rating, things like that.
Maybe the OP could post a couple of games he has played against masters OTB and annotate them. I would be especially interested to read his annotations in a tough OTB endgame for example...
I am just the kind of guy that says innocent until proven guilty. I can just as easily say that you are faking your 2053 Standard rating. What is your proof that Sunshine is cheating. I mean, something actually worth saying...
Of course, you don't have to trust me. You may note that my identity is public, as is my FIDE rating. I've also been a member of chess.com for 7 years, while the OP is back since a couple of weeks only, implying one of his previous accounts had been shut down.
I simply invite everybody to think by themselves, like in a real chess game :-)
As for the OP's technical chess skills, I'm still unconvinced, but maybe they could shine through in another piece of analysis ?
So... does Sexy qualify or not...??