| Opening: | B06: Pterodactyl Defense: Western, Rhamporhynchus | ||
Get Free Coaching
Sort:
ConnorMacleod_151
Dec 21, 2014
0
#81
lol never heard of that opening :D
Dec 21, 2014
0
#83
Inaccuracies: 4 = 12.9% of moves
Mistakes: 0 = 0.0% of moves
Blunders: 0 = 0.0% of moves
^^^^^^^^ from computer analysis
Dec 21, 2014
0
#84
Sexy-Sunshine wrote:
lol never heard of that opening :D
That's what it said.... lol
ConnorMacleod_151 wrote:
Inaccuracies: 4 = 12.9% of moves
Mistakes: 0 = 0.0% of moves
Blunders: 0 = 0.0% of moves
^^^^^^^^ from computer analysis
yes but you have to admit that the computer analysis on chess.com arent that good. I mean there were some serious blunders in your game as Ra7. To call that an inaccuracy seems strange :D. Another problem with the computer analysis is that it doesnt have such a good positional understanding as human beings. Computers simply play with tactics.
Yes. And the computer here does not seem to have lots of opening knowledge...
Dec 21, 2014
0
#89
Now i'm gonna give u a 960 ... i won't tell u which side i played.
ehm okay? :D I have to find out or what?
wow crazy stuff. I will try my best.
previously i was not suspicious. but now may be i've reason to be...
"Candidate Master (CM)
Introduced in 2002, the most usual way for a player to qualify for the Candidate Master title is by achieving an Elo rating of 2200 or more. Candidate master ranks below other open FIDE titles, but above the WFM and WCM titles."
-> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIDE_titles
not strange! if black is a fan of KID, he may try to transpose to that.
see the book move below:
2... Nf6 is definately better by computer choice!
Well, it might be that this is the case for some countries but all the Candidate Masters I played OTB were rated 2100. And at least in the US NM is 2200 rating...
And to the other part I have to admit that I dont understand it. I did not know that Bg7 is played more often than Nf6 but anyway that does not change my opinion that Nf6 is practically seen more accurate. As I said I dont think it is better in any way, its just that I find that Nf6 makes a bit more sense because of whites opening play. What I mean is that white played Nf3 followed by d4, so he cant play most of the very dangerous lines against the kingsindian (like the Saemisch or 4 pawn attack etc.). With 2...Nf6 you would more or less force white into the classical kingsindian main line which is surely something good for black because he does not need to worry about any other lines. So for me playing 2... Bg7 doesnt make as much sense although it surely isnt a bad move. Not mentioning that 2...Bg7 allows the very dangerous attack with long castle which could have been avoided with 2...Nf6. Hope you get my point. Ah and another thing.... What is that for a database? I would recommend you chessbase, yours is probably very old and inaccurate...
Can you coach me via messages??? Pls??
Yes, sure.
;)
