Great feature request

Should be able to see the other guy's desktop in a tiny window. That way I know the other guy is not using an engine.

Killer feature!

Not really. Your opponent could always use a second computer.

Too high.

You play 5|0 blitz games. You have to really fast to input the opponent's moves in an engine, wait for it to calculate and than make your move. 

Imo it's not really possible to use an engine for 5min games. It would be more an issue on slow games but not really for blitz... 

When I play vs Deep Fritz 14 on really easy setting (because I'm a beginner). It can take the computer 5+ minutes thinktime for the entire game. And that's with a multi thread engine on i7 processor. 
Good luck in using this for high level games in 5min games...  

There are privacy issues.

I would like to see more detailed stats

instead of giving only the total wins and losses for standard, blitz or bullet games it would be nice if you kept track of each person's record when playing different openings

that's easy to circumvent using virtual machine, second computer or even a smartphone if ratings aren't too high. I think privacy issues would scare a lot more honest players than cheaters

They already have that...check the game explorer and go under "My Games".  

If only Game Explorer worked...

I really hope you were being sarcastic by this...any implentation of technology like that on ANY site or computer is not only completely wrong but would likely bring about the apocalypse.  Seriously...lol

True, it works sometimes though. 

(FIX IT CHESS.COM!!!!!  )

              YOU choose that user name. You fix it.

     AxeKnight 

I didn't choose my username, Sir Paul did.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0I2ZrBuFdQ

It is possible to cheat at every time control on Chess.com including one minute bullet chess. Time to untrack this forum now.

So, about that game we just played. You lost horribly and you accuse me of cheating, when you were the one making mistakes leading into your loss (I did a Stockfish analysis of our game, so yes, it's your fault). But really, I didn't even need an engine to see your mistakes. Don't make false accusations you have zero evidence for just because you can't handle a loss like an adult. Plus, was that language really necessary lol? It's just a game, is it not?

As for an on-topic response, I don't think this is a great feature for the reasons everyone else stated. Have you analyzed the games (with say, Stockfish) where you think your opponent "plays like Kasparov"? Make sure you aren't the one making the mistakes before you make a claim. 

I guess I have no way of really "proving" I wasn't using an engine, but I'll say Stockfish disagreed with a number of my moves when it analyzed our game. That's a pretty good indication I made inaccuracies that a powerful engine wouldn't. In addition, I made my moves pretty quickly... I doubt I'd be able to use an engine that fast. If you refuse to believe me, then I'll let you be ignorant. All I'm looking for is a simple game of chess. Kay?

Lol, there is no indication this is sarcasm, so I wouldn't assume it is. Why didn't you state it was sarcasm to everyone else who commented? They took it seriously too, did they not? How strange.

And have you nothing to say about the childish rage you posted? You sounded a bit upset. Like I was cheating or something. Yeah, defintely something about me using a chess engine. Hm. 

And since you really ARE paranoid about how much cheating goes on in online chess, this posts looks more serious. :) Are you going to use your pathetic ad hominem attacks to bury the fact that your terrible moves drove your own loss? Don't bother; at this point, you're already admitting defeat haha. :) Have a nice day.

Fine, have a terrible day instead. You're a picky one.

I'm not acting this way because I won, I'm acting like this because you're accusing me of cheating. And you aren't giving me a reason. Plus the immature raging. I would be saying the same thing regardless of our ratings.

I'm not acting like I'm your friend one bit. You can do without what?

What do you mean a "whole page of cheats"? Does that even change anything I said?

Good god, I can't even get a single point through your head, can I? Ignorance is bliss, I take it. Don't worry, I'm not sick atm, I don't need to. And I've got plenty of tissues if you need one. You have no idea how to debate or argue, so I'm done talking with you. Oh, and thanks for the game! :)