Has anyone ever had a 100% Accuracy game? Is it possible?

The highest I've had is a 99.8 in about 10 moves, but I can't seem to find that analysis so I'll post this which is 99.7 (only 7 moves).

Obviously it's not possible to play a long, full game with 100% but maybe short games with only book moves or something of the sort might be possible?

Analysis page

accuracy is utter nonsense. so many low rated players play their games poorly but stil get high accuracies. its not impossible for an amateur to win bullet and get 99% accuracy fair n square against an opponent who plays poorly after he/she checkmates him/her in midgame... multiple times!!

the real problem is how chess.com analysis keeps over estimating our 'ingame' strength.

i have played against a 2500 rated bot (don't be fooled by his rating. he's weaker). i copied the PGN and analyzed. we played poorly yet each got over 90% accuracy. i didn't even bother taking much time to move. tried 2nd time in an exact position against the same bot, to check where exactly i made a fatal mistake. still played poorly yet still got another >90% accuracy.

conclusion: accuracy is utter nonsense. it makes me wanna puke. and seriously, i am really offended by this

Yes

The analysis tool seems to be in perpetual change- now scoring games absurdly high and low. Well played games are seen with scores in the 20’s with few mistakes.

To answer the question, It's only possible if you each play only book moves.

This happened once to me, I played the 2 knights in the caro and opponent resigned.

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nxe5!? Nxe5 5. d4 Nc6 6. d5 Nb8 7. e5 Ng8 8. d6 cxd6 9. exd6 Qf6 10. Nb5 Na6 11. Bc4 Qe5+ 12. Be3 Nf6 13. O-O b6 14. Re1 Ne4 15. Bd5 Rb8 16. Bd4 Qxd5 17. Nc7+ Kd8 18. Nxd5 Nxd6 19. Be5 Bb7 20. Qd2 f6 21. Bxd6 Bxd6 22. Nxf6 gxf6 23. Qxd6 Rg8 24. g3 Bc6 25. Rad1 Rc8 26. Re7 Rc7 27. Rxh7 Kc8 28. h4 Re8 29. h5 Nc5 30. h6 Ne4 31. Qf4 Ng5 32. Rg7 Nh3+ 33. Kh2 Nxf4 34. gxf4 Rh8 35. h7 Kb7 36. Rd6 Be4 37. Rxf6 Rxh7+ 38. Rxh7 Bxh7 39. c3 Rc5 40. Rf7 Rh5+ 41. Kg3 Bf5 42. Re7 Kc6 43. Re5 d6 44. Re7 a5 45. f3 b5 46. Ra7 a4 47. Rg7 Kd5 48. Rg5 Rxg5+ 49. fxg5 Kc4 50. Kf4 Bg6 51. Kg4 Kb3 52. f4 Kxb2 53. f5 Bxf5+ 54. Kxf5 a3 55. g6 a2 56. g7 a1=Q 57. g8=Q Qf1+ 58. Ke4 Qe2+ 59. Kf4 Qc4+ 60. Qxc4 bxc4 61. Ke4 Kxc3 62. Kd5 Kd3

the highest ive got i think is more than 80 percent

You guys are talking very funny.

Play chess, with wooden pieces, face to face.

No computers.

The question doesn't even exist.

The only accuracy you need is more accurate than your opponent.

Biggest hater of online chess for no reason

I saw a magnus carlsen's game with 100% accuracy in chess. Com

Computers do not exist. Not really. It is an incredibly sophisticated tool. The most sophisticated tool man ever created. Billions of microscopic parts. It is a crutch, a very useful crutch.

It is not real. Turn off the electricity and it disappears.

I go to Wendy's. Some guy asks me for money. Not a problem. I won't give money, but I bought him a meal.

I ask him for a favor. Apply for a job at Wendy's.

Wendy's don't have paper applications like it used to when I was younger and working at McDonald's. You have to apply online.

This computer crutch has gone too far.

I go to Planet Fitness. One year, I have a barcode on a piece of paper coated by plastic.

The next year, log in is by QR code off of an I-Phone.

Compare the sophistication (stupidity) of a QR code off of an I-Phone to a piece of paper with black lines coated in plastic.

This computer thing has gone too far. It makes people stupid.

Ist is possible, because the Wayward Attack counts as theory, and if you somehow can checkmate youre opponent still in the Theory, you get 100% accuracy.

a friend of mine wants did this and got 100%

A Gym.

Metal.

Gravity.

That's the genius of a gym. The genius that lies in simplicity.

You don't need a Stairmaster machine. All you need is . . . stairs.

Machines has made us dumber.

I have 6 Windows laptop that died.

Screen death.

Hard Drive failure.

Power failure.

All computers die.

A wooden chess set. A wind-up clock. Pencil and paper. They will always be around and easily replaced.

There was a storm last week.

Electrical power was out for 2 days.

That's how un-real computers are.

My silicone chess set is fine inside my apartment during the storm.

Impossible unless using stockfish to cheat.

I have a Gymboss count-down timer. It is very useful.

Sometimes, I don't have it with me when I go to the gym.

Damn, I have to count to 12 for reps (repetitions) again, like I did before.

That Gymboss is a very useful tool.

But the natural state of things is zero technology.

Not even pencil and paper is natural. You don't always carry it around with you.