Yep, that's right, but it will have to sift through another 959 setups with tablebases etc - 960 chess in the year 2200-odd will be the revival of chess if it ever goes down in the 22nd century. The 23rd century will be owned by 960 (in the chess world lol)
If you do it for one, its trivial do do it for 960.
Butm, as Pfren noted, good luck with doing it with standard. The claculation is huge, and you have to store the results somewhere.
I'm not solving it lol just playing it!! The people solving it are computers - they are creating the tablebases, namely the 7-piece endgame tablebase which will replace the 6-piece endgame tablebase we get with modern engines when it is finished next year. Houdini 5.0 will probably be the first engine (late 2014) to feature the 7-piece tablebase. All modern engines have 6-piece endgame tablebases that's what takes up most of the memory of the disk.
As for storage it will take up a mere nano-fracture of all the data that is stored on the WWW. - as technology improves, storing say a 10-piece endgame tablebase in 20 years time won't be that hard. I am guessing a lot of the numbers here (years-wise) but I have read a few articles about the 7-piece tablebase in the making.
The size of the hard drive required to store the 32 piece endgame of chess: larger or smaller than the star Arcturus?
At the moment... LARGER!! 
- give it 200 years it will sit in a mainframe no larger than a car lol 
" There will never be a chess-machine playing better than me" Kasparov after loosin against the computer. Ivanchuk won the tournament.
The discussion of the Queen-Queen-Knightpawn endgame was not solved : Pachmann wrote in his book - probably drawn, and Botvinnik wrote - of course it's won.