Have you had any good games recently? Post it here!

Sort:
Avatar of Unleash_the_Queens

If you had a nice game you want to share with us, simply post it here with a little bit of analysis!

I recently had a very nice game, where I played surprisingly accurate for my newbie level against the semi-slav, an opening I really know nothing about and how to defeat it! Here it is:



Avatar of Unleash_the_Queens

Oh, I almost forgot!

Avatar of Unleash_the_Queens

Bump.

Avatar of Unleash_the_Queens

Come on guys! Anybody?

Avatar of x-1338650111

dont be fast. we will post just wait and give us some time.

do you like this?
http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=85917616 

Avatar of kleelof

I've never had much luck either getting people to respond to my posted games.

You did a good job of taking advantage of your opponents numerous mistakes to create a viable plan of getting into his back ranks.

Avatar of x-1338650111

you talk about my game, dont you?
if yes then thanks

Avatar of kleelof
salatoy wrote:

you talk about my game, dont you?
if yes then thanks

Sorry, no. I was talking about Unleash_the_Queens game.

I think you are better off posting your game in this forum.

Like I'm about to do.

Here is a fun game I played recently. I lost. That made it even more fun.Laughing

After most games, I go through the game and add my comments. These have 'L:' before them.

Then I run the game through Fritz. Comments and lines without 'L:' are from fritz.

I then sometimes go back and answer suggestions made by Fritz.

The process can take 15 - 60 minutes depending on the game.



Avatar of Spectator94

Unleash_The_Queens
at move 7 u say ''But I played c5 mainly to achieve donkey to d6, mainly to snatch one of his pesky commanders (bishops).''

Slav players usually favor their knights over bishops as the bishops dont have much space with that pawn structure and all. Yes it's usually a good idea to trade your knight for a bishop but in Slav-structures you will only do Black a favor.

Avatar of Unleash_the_Queens
salatoy wrote:

dont be fast. we will post just wait and give us some time.

do you like this?
http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=85917616 

Salatoy very nice. Why did he sacrifice his queen? Bad blunder! I also like the way your king went all the way to white's camp, like a secret agent!

Avatar of Unleash_the_Queens
kleelof wrote:
salatoy wrote:

you talk about my game, dont you?
if yes then thanks

Sorry, no. I was talking about Unleash_the_Queens game.

I think you are better off posting your game in this forum.

Like I'm about to do.

Here is a fun game I played recently. I lost. That made it even more fun.

After most games, I go through the game and add my comments. These have 'L:' before them.

Then I run the game through Fritz. Comments and lines without 'L:' are from fritz.

I then sometimes go back and answer suggestions made by Fritz.

The process can take 15 - 60 minutes depending on the game.

 



Nice game. Very nice, and crumped and complex. Just how I like them. It doesn't matter you lost. You played very well, using all your opponent's weaknesses!

Avatar of Unleash_the_Queens
Serotonine wrote:

Unleash_The_Queens
at move 7 u say ''But I played c5 mainly to achieve donkey to d6, mainly to snatch one of his pesky commanders (bishops).''

Slav players usually favor their knights over bishops as the bishops dont have much space with that pawn structure and all. Yes it's usually a good idea to trade your knight for a bishop but in Slav-structures you will only do Black a favor.

Yes, you are right, but his knights weren't placed very well, and also I opened up the game AND kept the bishop pair. The position I got was very pleasant for me. Also, I exterminated his dark squared bishop, who was a little bit more important in that position.

Avatar of WISH_I_WAS_A_GM

Absolutely meaningless game : http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=780196789

Avatar of Unleash_the_Queens
Jzhong wrote:

Here's another blitz game I have, very entertaining:

 

http://www.chess.com/livechess/analysis?id=780989965

Nice game, especially for a blitz one. Also, you were too facing the Dutch defence. You managed to do so better than me.

Avatar of Unleash_the_Queens
Jzhong wrote:

How about this one:

http://www.chess.com/livechess/analysis?id=770932775

 

It's a 2-min game with a dubious exchange sac by Black and a mating attack on move 29 with mate in two.

Black found the mate eventually on move 36 with a few seconds on the clock. The repetition of moves leading to mate on h2 is hilarious.

I really loved the mate!

Avatar of Unleash_the_Queens
WISH_I_WAS_A_GM wrote:

Absolutely meaningless game : http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=780196789

How did it end?

Avatar of WISH_I_WAS_A_GM

He resigned

Avatar of WISH_I_WAS_A_GM

A nice defending game here

http://www.chess.com/echess/game?id=85503120

Avatar of Spectator94
Unleash_the_Queens wrote:
Serotonine wrote:

Unleash_The_Queens
at move 7 u say ''But I played c5 mainly to achieve donkey to d6, mainly to snatch one of his pesky commanders (bishops).''

Slav players usually favor their knights over bishops as the bishops dont have much space with that pawn structure and all. Yes it's usually a good idea to trade your knight for a bishop but in Slav-structures you will only do Black a favor.

Yes, you are right, but his knights weren't placed very well, and also I opened up the game AND kept the bishop pair. The position I got was very pleasant for me. Also, I exterminated his dark squared bishop, who was a little bit more important in that position.

I couldn't disagree more, in positions like that the knights need maybe 1-2 moves to get decent squares. Plus in the position after your 7. c5 the bishop on c8 might even be the worst piece in the black position. Sure, maybe he became important later on in the game but I simply respond to your explanation of c5.

Avatar of Unleash_the_Queens
Serotonine wrote:
Unleash_the_Queens wrote:
Serotonine wrote:

Unleash_The_Queens
at move 7 u say ''But I played c5 mainly to achieve donkey to d6, mainly to snatch one of his pesky commanders (bishops).''

Slav players usually favor their knights over bishops as the bishops dont have much space with that pawn structure and all. Yes it's usually a good idea to trade your knight for a bishop but in Slav-structures you will only do Black a favor.

Yes, you are right, but his knights weren't placed very well, and also I opened up the game AND kept the bishop pair. The position I got was very pleasant for me. Also, I exterminated his dark squared bishop, who was a little bit more important in that position.

I couldn't disagree more, in positions like that the knights need maybe 1-2 moves to get decent squares. Plus in the position after your 7. c5 the bishop on c8 might even be the worst piece in the black position. Sure, maybe he became important later on in the game but I simply respond to your explanation of c5.

OK, I understand it.