history of chinese chess

ancient

This is the version of the "Aryans nationalist (Indians and people who believe that ancient India was created by the "European" pseudo-ethnic)", there is evidence that both Xiangqi and Chaturanga are descendants of an ancient Chinese game called Liubo.

The "Aryan nationalists" never admit that "their" culture of was created by another people. The Greek culture for example, it obviously created by the Fertile Crescent civilizations but they insist on denying it, even if it is something that even the ancient Greeks knew and admitted (see: Black Athena by Martin Bernal).

Come to National Museum in Beijing then lol

This forum is full of trolls, and I'm utilizing it as long as the staff won't close it.

Alas I see a lot of ignorance here, many people believing they know because they read something somewhere once. History of chess is a matter on which historians have worked. For curious people, open-minded: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-k_-UbPAQvE

@long_quach Your statements are pretty much like Alice Through the looking-glass. In this imaginary world of allegories, distorted mirrors and fantasy you make sense, well done !

@long_quach That is exactly the point, you are never wrong, you are always right, you cannot be mistaken. Es gibt keine überlegene Rasse !!! meine Liebe. Do not forget to take your pills and take care.

You are the descendant of that, not Xiangqi

You need to go to the museum though instead of checking their website, I sure you don't dare to go to Beijing Museum to see this. It will shock you hard.

You don't see chess set because you didn't go to the museum. I can't say your about your family before I know them or seeing them lol. You're not valid.

Xiangqi is not elephant chess by the way, I don't mind repeat towards the trolls😄

Then tell me how many museum are there in Beijing, you don't even know

Yup that's true 

Good to know you are

I know what I am while you know who you are and you just show us all😄

I suggest you go to the museum to look for yourself other than putting your own subjective assumption which is not true.

I feel bad when there's one old folk only able to repeat and repeat the same thing even though everyone showed him the proof. Still, it won't changed reality because the artifacts is still there to give him culture shock.

Still continue with your own assumption? Have you been to museum in Beijing? 

The old Xiangqi photo that I shown is from a museum in our capital city, have you been there before playing around the bushes?