Honor System

Sort:
bukerchi

I'd like to see an 'honor system' members could join.   Members take a pledge.  Upon taking the pledge the member receives an icon by their name.....a blue star, or...?  All Blue Star members promise to play using the rules of the pledge.

Gold Star members pledge:

No Cheating, no trash talking, no intentional disconnects, accept a rematch or state why unable to do so.  No running out the clock.   

There are probably more principles....ideas?

Perhaps the 'Blue Star' members could have special tournaments....perhaps some exclusive benefits

 

 

 

To play witho

funandniceisme

Imagine the accounts people would open just to join this honor system and troll.

DrSpudnik

The all-too-likely outcome.

People are monsters.

heinzie

I think this is a most honorable proposal

Oraoradeki

Just like they identify FIDE titled players, I think we should adopt a name verification, i.e. in order to create an account here, you have to give your real name.

I believe anonymity causes dishonorable acts. Would you let the clock run out when you are in a losing position in an OTB game?

WBFISHER

many people on this website use the honor system you covet.   it's a good reason for the "friends" option. 

Cystem_Phailure
bukerchi wrote:

Gold Star members pledge:

No Cheating, no trash talking, no intentional disconnects, accept a rematch or state why unable to do so.  No running out the clock.  

Let's see, a Johns Hopkins study of high school teens who signed a "virginity" pledge found identical rates of sex among the signers as among the non-signers (except those who signed were less likely to use contraception).

Sure, set up an honor pledge.  Especially the part about people being required to give a reason to decline a rematch.  What could possibly go wrong? 

bukerchi

'

Thanks for the responses.  An honor system can be enforced.  And yes, nothing is an absolute.  We could play 'friends' only, but that is so limiting in an exciting variety of thousands of players.  We can choose just to put up with the negatives, but we can also choose to create an ethical environment.  Hmmmmmm....how about a site exclusively for cheaters, trash talkers, disconnecters and clock runners?  

Cystem_Phailure

How about just starting a group for people of like mind instead of trying to change the entire website to meet your wishes?  Or doesn't that provide enough reinforcement of self-superiority?

funandniceisme
bukerchi wrote:

'

Thanks for the responses.  An honor system can be enforced.  And yes, nothing is an absolute.  We could play 'friends' only, but that is so limiting in an exciting variety of thousands of players.  We can choose just to put up with the negatives, but we can also choose to create an ethical environment.  Hmmmmmm....how about a site exclusively for cheaters, trash talkers, disconnecters and clock runners?  

Umm a site exclusively for cheater is pointless. Why would anyone willingly join a site known for cheaters, trash talkers, etc?

johnmusacha
Cystem_Phailure wrote:

How about just starting a group for people of like mind instead of trying to change the entire website to meet your wishes?  Or doesn't that provide enough reinforcement of self-superiority?

Do you have S.A.R.R.S.?

JGambit
funandniceisme wrote:
bukerchi wrote:

'

Thanks for the responses.  An honor system can be enforced.  And yes, nothing is an absolute.  We could play 'friends' only, but that is so limiting in an exciting variety of thousands of players.  We can choose just to put up with the negatives, but we can also choose to create an ethical environment.  Hmmmmmm....how about a site exclusively for cheaters, trash talkers, disconnecters and clock runners?  

Umm a site exclusively for cheater is pointless. Why would anyone willingly join a site known for cheaters, trash talkers, etc?

This site exists yahoo chess, (I've never been but I've heard)

johnmusacha

Why the heck am I blocked from Cystem Phailure's notes?

Cystem_Phailure
johnmusacha wrote:
Cystem_Phailure wrote:

How about just starting a group for people of like mind instead of trying to change the entire website to meet your wishes?  Or doesn't that provide enough reinforcement of self-superiority?

Do you have S.A.R.R.S.?

Oh, now things will improve.  Musacha just slimed out from under his rock.

johnmusacha
tkbunny wrote:
johnmusacha wrote:

Why the heck am I blocked from Cystem Phailure's notes?

& then the serial blocker asks why he is blocked

You're the only person I have blocked actually.  You're a bit too much of a dumbass.

johnmusacha
Cystem_Phailure wrote:
johnmusacha wrote:
Cystem_Phailure wrote:

How about just starting a group for people of like mind instead of trying to change the entire website to meet your wishes?  Or doesn't that provide enough reinforcement of self-superiority?

Do you have S.A.R.R.S.?

Oh, now things will improve.  Musacha just slimed out from under his rock.

I don't even know who this fat Cystem Phailure guy is and he's insulting me.  What gives?  

TheCatOnBoard1
[COMMENT DELETED]
funandniceisme

lol because pledging to something from behind my computer screen means NOTHING

bukerchi
funandniceisme wrote:
bukerchi wrote:

'

Thanks for the responses.  An honor system can be enforced.  And yes, nothing is an absolute.  We could play 'friends' only, but that is so limiting in an exciting variety of thousands of players.  We can choose just to put up with the negatives, but we can also choose to create an ethical environment.  Hmmmmmm....how about a site exclusively for cheaters, trash talkers, disconnecters and clock runners?  

Umm a site exclusively for cheater is pointless. Why would anyone willingly join a site known for cheaters, trash talkers, etc?

If we call up Captain Obvious he would tell us Bukerchi was kidding about the site for cheaters, etc.

funandniceisme

lol okay