Players with attractive female avatars

I noticed a player "nils12" primarily plays against attractive females. I know this as my avatar is one and low and behold the games request. has anyone had success playing against attractive females?

Pablo, You might consider using a different avatar pic.

The one you are using belongs to a girl who was murdered.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-45266948

OK, that's in pretty poor taste: @PabloEskoser, please choose a different avatar within the next 3 days, or this one will be removed.

Thanks,

David, moderator

Don't know about hot girls but if hot chicks are fine,  then check out @666Buffchix

Lol, if you have any issues ….just use your privacy settings...they work very well

That includes not permitting challenges

None....just that above...the privacy settings work very well.....but only if you use them

I was just going to ask her the same question.

 Jesus Christ David.....I wouldn't give him 3 days for that, but that's just me. I will block him for that. If he's got no respect for the dead, he's got no respect for the living. The OP joined in May and she went missing in July.....so he had a different avatar for 2 months.....even if it was the default pawn. This is the 1st Christmas those poor parents don't have their child. What if family, friends, loved ones, or neighbors log in to this site? That's disgusting.....you giving him 3 days. Please don't tell me the site has the morality of Trump now.  Have some common decency Chess.com....if not, maybe your T.O.S needs reviewing. You gave him a 72 hr pass????????......and you gave it to him under the title of "Hot Girls"?.....in GCD????  In the spirit of Christmas I'm gonna assume your just off your game......maybe you're in-laws got on your nerves.......maybe you had too much to drink but beware.......If "our" friend Postafi gets a hold of this.........you're never gonna hear the end of it.

Seriously David?  3 days???

If that photo is in poor taste?  The fact that you are giviing someone 3 days to change that photo is even worst taste. 

It might be to account for the case where the user has no access to internet till a weekday. 

Then if its something that "offensive" staff/mods can change the photo themselves. 

True but the 3 days does allow for a fair warning before a boot though. 

  NO!  The avatar should be changed immediately and a message can be posted on his homepage saying the previous one was innapropriate......even if he doesn't log in for 2 weeks. If I start swearing up an F-en storm......I will get muted immediately......even if I log out......I'll find out that I am muted the next time I log in. 

Yep seriously weak.

   David made a mistake which is unusual, but the OP dam well knew what he was doing. You don't just "accidentaly" use the avatar of a recently murdered college student.

They just get a kick out of muting you 😀

  And I don't mind being muted when I deserve it, but this is sick.  Pablo from Japan?  Suuure.  This is what you get when you Google the name......the link doesn't work thow.                                                                                                               

  The authority is my opinion. I'm normally in complete agreement with what mods & Staff do. I've seen enough arguments in 6 yrs but THIS time, I cannot agree with David using a time limit of 72 hrs to correct or implement a disgresionary action.  He says......"or this one will be removed".  So clearly, in his mind it touches the boundaries of being out of the scope of the T.O.S.  So my question is why allow it to continue for another 72 hrs??

So what is next?  Am i going to be allowed 3 days to cheat before something is done?  Can i now post about Christianity in the main forums for 3 days before it will be removed?  Can i now post nude pics on my profile page???  I might actually like this reversal of policy.