Hi! My name is Lauren Goodkind and I’m a respected chess coach and chess YouTuber based in California:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCP5SPSG_sWSYPjqJYMNwL_Q
The bots rating's are not accurate. The bot's ratings play way below their strength.
Hi! My name is Lauren Goodkind and I’m a respected chess coach and chess YouTuber based in California:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCP5SPSG_sWSYPjqJYMNwL_Q
The bots rating's are not accurate. The bot's ratings play way below their strength.
Hi! My name is Lauren Goodkind and I’m a respected chess coach and chess YouTuber based in California:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCP5SPSG_sWSYPjqJYMNwL_Q
The bots rating's are not accurate. The bot's ratings play way below their strength.
How much do you think they are under their rating by, i mean like is a 1000 bot similar to a 600 Human player for example?
I upgraded my Chess.com membership and get a Review with a Rating for every game played.
I have found that the bots' ratings vary from 100-850 from game to game. My rating also varies from 100 to 700. I have found that if I lose a lot to one bot, they lower their game so that I have a better chance at winning. If I beat them too often they raise their rating to give me a challenge.
Interestingly my Rating is highest when the Bot's rating is the lowest. In other words I play well when I am not challenged by a sophisticated game.
And of course my rating is much lower when I turn off all help (no hints and no take backs) and just have to let my Blunders stand.
Against the 1000 bots I can win maybe 30% of the time bu
Not accurate at all. I am by no means a chess expert but I consistently beat the 1800 Wally bot as it makes odd blunders. I think bots under a certain level are just programmed to blunder and the higher the level, the lower the percentage is.
Most of the bots play much more accurately than their rating for most of the game, then just make the hugest blunders for no reason. The higher rated bots are more accurate though, and tend to be above their rating.
Yeh so just that...how accurate are the bots ratings on here? I think they play way lower than their ratings suggest...i am only 550 rapid but i can comfortably beat all the bots up to 1000, 8 outta 10 times at least and the 1100-1300 bots i can beat quite often too (maybe 60% of the time)...Nelson is a pain in the a$$ but i can deal with him once i get his queen...i have beat a couple of the higher rated bots too but probably start to struggle with the 1300 - 1400+ bots...i am yet to beat Antonio haha...if i had to guess i wud say they play at least 400 under wot their ratings suggest coz i can struggle with human players around my own sorta rating n i doubt i cud beat an 800+ human player, i think my best win was over a 720 ish rated human player...wots ur thoughts on the bots n is it worth playing them or shud i jus get back to live chess?