Accuracy at cc is not the same as accuracy in other places
How are people in bullet/blitz playing more accurately than super gms in rapid?

HangingPiecesChomper, you are a joke man... No way your account still hasn't been banned. biggest troll, cheater I've ever seen

HangingPiecesChomper, you are a joke man... No way your account still hasn't been banned. biggest troll, cheater I've ever seen
i think everybody here is wondering why YOUR account isn't banned yet. constantly breaking forum rules and probably cheats as well, only plays rapid and sucks at blitz.

Accuracy was changed for CAPS2 so that scores would be adjusted for ratings levels.
A 90% for a 400 is not the same as a 90% for a 2500.

As I’ve explained to you previously, it’s a lot easier to get high accuracy in simple positions. Two beginners could trade all their pieces and agree a draw and have +95% accuracy. Doesn’t mean it was a good game where winning chances were created. Huge, complicated, tactical positions will inevitably be judged less accurate by the engines because they’re better than us humans. As you know.

So CAPS2 is like a personalization!?
Not really. The above says the accuracy score is adjusted by rating, like grading on a curve.
"The new accuracy scores replicate the feeling of being graded on a test in school.."
I took that to mean that a move that might be considered a mistake for a 2500 wouldn't be judged as harshly for a 1200 player.
I was watching at the CCT and saw the accuracy of some games in the 70-80 range.
Yet I see people on this site get over 80% accuracy all the time. That seems kind of crazy.