How Do You Like Opponent's Ratings...

Sort:
llama47

Higher? Lower?

All this mess with chess.com accidentally pairing some people way up or down, and their settings not working the way people expect / the way chess.com intended.

All this could be avoided if there were no options, and by default you only faced players +/- 150 or maybe +/- 200 points from your rating.

How would people feel about that?

In other words, do people even do crazy stuff like -50 +400 or the other way around, +50 -400 ?

---

For reference the stronger player will win about:
2 out of 3 for a 100 point gap
3 out of 4 for a 200 point gap
9 out of 10 for a 400 point gap

sndeww

Uh... I do -50 +infinite...

am I an outlier?

llama47

I don't know, maybe lots of people do that.

Recently I was getting a lot of 1900s and even one 1600, so yesterday I tried setting it to + and - 150.

1c6O-1

I do -400 and +

llama47

I thought I was being fair setting + and - the same... I do think playing higher rated players is useful (not just for instruction but also I think it's slightly better for gaining rating). Maybe I'll try different settings.

JackRoach

I'll probably try -50 +infinity.

LeeEuler

I'm getting dejavu from this question and the answers. But I'm +/- infinity since I just want quick pairings and don't really care about opponent.

KMMCS88

I don't know how accurate the references are for me, so I just allow anyone rated higher than me to challenge me.

goldenbeer
I prefer to play against higher rated players, since they make less mistakes. I do -25 +infinity
sndeww

hey @goldenbeer we meet again

actually I would do -25 except this small voice in my head would whisper "coward, if you can't beat lower rated players you don't deserve your rating"

so I'm basically self pressured into making my settings looser.

JackRoach
B1ZMARK wrote:

hey @goldenbeer we meet again

actually I would do -25 except this small voice in my head would whisper "coward, if you can't beat lower rated players you don't deserve your rating"

so I'm basically self pressured into making my settings looser.

You say, "Goldenbeer we meet again."

When we've been on, like, 30 threads together without saying, "JackRoach, we meet again."

sndeww
JackRoach hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:

hey @goldenbeer we meet again

actually I would do -25 except this small voice in my head would whisper "coward, if you can't beat lower rated players you don't deserve your rating"

so I'm basically self pressured into making my settings looser.

You say, "Goldenbeer we meet again."

When we've been on, like, 30 threads together without saying, "JackRoach, we meet again."

wanna mutual unblock now? grin.png

JackRoach
B1ZMARK wrote:
JackRoach hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:

hey @goldenbeer we meet again

actually I would do -25 except this small voice in my head would whisper "coward, if you can't beat lower rated players you don't deserve your rating"

so I'm basically self pressured into making my settings looser.

You say, "Goldenbeer we meet again."

When we've been on, like, 30 threads together without saying, "JackRoach, we meet again."

wanna mutual unblock now?

Ha, you are the first to mention it!

I waited to see when you decided to unblock me. Sure, mutual unblock.

sndeww
JackRoach hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:
JackRoach hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:

hey @goldenbeer we meet again

actually I would do -25 except this small voice in my head would whisper "coward, if you can't beat lower rated players you don't deserve your rating"

so I'm basically self pressured into making my settings looser.

You say, "Goldenbeer we meet again."

When we've been on, like, 30 threads together without saying, "JackRoach, we meet again."

wanna mutual unblock now?

Ha, you are the first to mention it!

I waited to see when you decided to unblock me. Sure, mutual unblock.

I mean, I also knew this was gonna be a mental test of who could last longer, but we can't be divided in hard times like these... especially when huge white arctic bears are on the loose...

JackRoach
B1ZMARK wrote:
JackRoach hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:
JackRoach hat geschrieben:
B1ZMARK wrote:

hey @goldenbeer we meet again

actually I would do -25 except this small voice in my head would whisper "coward, if you can't beat lower rated players you don't deserve your rating"

so I'm basically self pressured into making my settings looser.

You say, "Goldenbeer we meet again."

When we've been on, like, 30 threads together without saying, "JackRoach, we meet again."

wanna mutual unblock now?

Ha, you are the first to mention it!

I waited to see when you decided to unblock me. Sure, mutual unblock.

I mean, I also knew this was gonna be a mental test of who could last longer, but we can't be divided in hard times like these... especially when huge white arctic bears are on the loose...

Divided? B1Z I wanted to kill the bear and get all of the meat.

But now we took him down together so we have to share sad.png

sndeww

ha, you kill him?? With your dad gone and your low blitz rating?? You were doing pipi in your pampers while I was beating players much weaker than you! and "j"ack "r" och is just a nobody to-

JackRoach
B1ZMARK wrote:

ha, you kill him?? With your dad gone and your low blitz rating?? You were doing pipi in your pampers while I was beating players much weaker than you! and "j"ack "r" och is just a nobody to-

lol.

llama47

Wait, you really blocked him for playing the London?

haha

sndeww
llama47 hat geschrieben:

Wait, you really blocked him for playing the London?

haha

well

like

yeah i did that happy.png

To be exact, I blocked him for playing, advocating, and not changing his stance on the london.

JackRoach
llama47 wrote:

Wait, you really blocked him for playing the London?

haha

We mutual unblocked a few minutes ago.

He asked for the mutual unblock though, we were waiting to see who would ask for it first and I won lol.