How does the elo here compare to FIDE elo?

Sort:
Uaim7313

I'm 1750 here, does that equate to my FIDE elo?

justbefair
Uaim7313 wrote:

I'm 1750 here, does that equate to my FIDE elo?

No. First off, there is no formula for translation. There have been some limited comparisons done.

Second, you just joined here so your rapid rating has not yet stabilized.

 

Uaim7313
justbefair wrote:
Uaim7313 wrote:

I'm 1750 here, does that equate to my FIDE elo?

No.

 

what would you is the fide elo?

Awesomebro2
Yeah
blueemu

You've only played ten games. Your chess.com rating (and it's Glicko-2, not Elo) might be off by hundreds of points.

In any case... a rating only makes sense within a specific pool of players. You can't compare a rating from one player pool to a hypothetical rating in a completely different player pool.

It isn't even comparing apples and oranges... it's comparing apples and rocks.

Uaim7313
blueemu wrote:

You've only played ten games. Your chess.com rating (and it's Glicko-2, not Elo) might be off by hundreds of points.

In any case... a rating only makes sense within a specific pool of players. You can't compare a rating from one player pool to a hypothetical rating in a completely different player pool.

It isn't even comparing apples and oranges... it's comparing apples and rocks.

I am 1800 today, how many to be played before an accurate representation of your current rating?

Born2slaYer

Chess.com and fide are completely diff.

pfren

Different rating systems, different player pools -----> they can't be compared.

Uaim7313
PathOfNerd wrote:
Uaim7313 wrote:
justbefair wrote:
Uaim7313 wrote:

I'm 1750 here, does that equate to my FIDE elo?

No.

 

what would you is the fide elo?

Probably 1300...

are you joking? I would crash 1300 players at any pool

Uaim7313
PathOfNerd wrote:
Uaim7313 wrote:
PathOfNerd wrote:
Uaim7313 wrote:
justbefair wrote:
Uaim7313 wrote:

I'm 1750 here, does that equate to my FIDE elo?

No.

 

what would you is the fide elo?

Probably 1300...

are you joking? I would crash 1300 players at any pool

I'm not joining... I have a friend of mine. His highest rating on chess.com was 1800++ and he very recently lost two games to 1300 USCF (not even FIDE) players... So, I'm not joking! Also, I've seen a lot of 1600 FIDE rated players with 2000+ here at blitz, not even rapid (rapid is much easier on lower levels).

That's definitely not the norm... it says here that a standard rating of 1800 chess.com is often equal to 2000 in FIDE

Chess.com Rating Comparisons - Chess.com

blueemu
Uaim7313 wrote:

... it says here that a standard rating of 1800 chess.com is often equal to 2000 in FIDE

Chess.com Rating Comparisons - Chess.com

So that would make me near GM strength? That hardly seems likely.

katiagil

HI

llama47

Here is a rough comparison:

https://chessgoals.com/rating-comparison/

llama47

Anyway, I know it's disappointing, but if you're a young player who has never been to a tournament then your online ratings are likely a lot higher than your FIDE / USCF / etc rating will be.

Born2slaYer
Uaim7313 wrote:
PathOfNerd wrote:
Uaim7313 wrote:
justbefair wrote:
Uaim7313 wrote:

I'm 1750 here, does that equate to my FIDE elo?

No.

 

what would you is the fide elo?

Probably 1300...

are you joking? I would crash 1300 players at any pool

You are more likely to loose from 1200.

blueemu

I was around 2000 OTB (Canadian Chess Federation rating). When I started here on chess.com, I quickly went up to 2000-odd rating and more-or-less stabilized there. Then slow progress to just under 2200, and a quick jump to 2350.

(Then ZOOM up to a super-GM-ish 2750, and immediately back down again. But the less said about that, the better).

Born2slaYer
blueemu wrote:

I was around 2000 OTB (Canadian Chess Federation rating). When I started here on chess.com, I quickly went up to 2000-odd rating and more-or-less stabilized there. Then slow progress to just under 2200, and a quick jump to 2350.

(Then ZOOM up to a super-GM-ish 2750, and immediately back down again. But the less said about that, the better).

Your blitz rating will be around 2500 if you start playing blitz.

blueemu
CongoratsUlost2me wrote:
blueemu wrote:

I was around 2000 OTB (Canadian Chess Federation rating). When I started here on chess.com, I quickly went up to 2000-odd rating and more-or-less stabilized there. Then slow progress to just under 2200, and a quick jump to 2350.

(Then ZOOM up to a super-GM-ish 2750, and immediately back down again. But the less said about that, the better).

Your blitz rating will be around 2500 if you start playing blitz.

I'm in my 60s and nearly blind. I expect my Blitz rating would be 800 or so.

Made_in_Shoreditch

To put things into perspective here competitive U10 OTB tournament chess players can achieve a 1000 FIDE rapid play rating. Those that continue with OTB chess clubs, studying with a chess coach and playing in OTB tournaments and leagues can increase that initial rating by 100+ points per year. The most talented of juniors can achieve FM, IM and even GM titles in 10 years, others can take longer. Yuri Shabanov took over half a century he started playing competitive chess at the age of 14 in 1951, he achieved the GM title in 2003 aged 66!

It's a slow process.

ChampoftheBepoCamp

I am not sure... 

Appeal to authority : Hikaru said like -400 difference compared chess.com rating to fide... in a recent video he published on youtube

 

1 data happy.png : @danielguel

1904 highscore of rapid currently, 1900s ish || <1900 rapid on chess.com

His recent tournament He said it a bit rockey but USCF 1791 to 1766, I am not sure about time controls; Rapid or Classical I guess