How many blitz games, puzzles, lessons etc should I do?

Puzzle rating means nothing.

You’re definitely reaching 1600. Go for a higher goal.

noice. I'm not that good at puzzles lol.

lol, u rlly think so?

 There are obvious problems, which are solved concretely through tactics and calculation, and there are predictable problems, which are sought out or avoided through positional play and positional evaluation.

Most self-learners try to improve their results by focusing on calculation and tactics. This makes sense because the rivals they face frequently make tactical mistakes.

The stronger players, however, strive to improve their predictive abilities in the medium and long term, by studying positional play and positional evaluation.

Now, for someone who does not have a clear idea of ​​what to use in the position to develop their own predictive abilities, I suggest starting with the ABC: ".Three Hundred Chess Games", by Siegbert Tarrasch In terms of taking advantage of all that the position offers, the book is somewhat out of date. But in the sense of opening the eyes of the newcomer, it is magnificent.

With some talent and some work, some reach above average in a year or two. Although it must be honestly said that not so much because of doing it well as because others do it worse.

 Many consider "decent" to be above average. Let's say, using the ratings, to be above 1500–1600.

Experience in the games played is used to direct the study. In other words, where mistakes are made, where it is not clear what to do, the grandmasters’ example is sought.

In the same sense, the grandmasters’ games are studied as preparation or prevention for the problems that one expects to find on the board.

The objective is to be more efficient in the time dedicated and topics to study, as well as to be stronger in solving the problems that commonly arise in each one's games.

Speed chess is not much like classical chess. Yes, they are the same pieces on the same board, but the demands for precision and the tension involved are totally different. Most cannot stand it, they get discouraged and leave it because while in speed chess it is possible to be moderately successful based on talent and intuition, classical chess is all of the above plus a lot 

thanks

thanks everyone. I think I"m going to do 5 rapid games in a day, 8 lessons, 4 puzzle rush, 10 puzzle battle and 20 puzzles

Try to learn how to get a groove going. After you get a good groove, keep playing until you lose it and wait to try again the next day.

This sounds like a good plan, but you should also analyse deeply your rapid games for alternative plans, tactical misses, and such.

yes, I will. Thank you!

Yes. I’m 1500 and my end of the year goal is 1800-1900.

basically what pfren said. unfortunately, i can't really set "rating goals" for myself in rapid though bc of many superhumans.