How many books to read before you're a master?

Sort:
Ziryab

Rule of the Bone by Russell Banks is Catcher in the Rye for today's 30-somethings.

DrSpudnik

If it takes 10,000 hours, a real slow reader needs to read only one book.

batgirl

I never "got" "Catcher in the Rye." In fact I found it a bit repulsive.   "Franny and Zooey" at least made me laugh in places though the characters tended to be somewhat pretentious and self-absorbed.  For some reason, "Catcher" always reminded me of  "Poem on an Underground Wall."

kco
DrSpudnik wrote:

If it takes 10,000 hours, a real slow reader needs to read only one book.

yeah like the War and Peace or all 3 books of Lord of the Rings.

Spectator94

Catcher in the Rye is one of the best books I ever read. Why? I don't know, it just is.

DrSpudnik

I have always hated Catcher in the Rye. I just wanted to slap that punk in the chops.

TheRealGMBobbyFish
batgirl wrote:

I never "got" "Catcher in the Rye." In fact I found it a bit repulsive. 

Maybe you should have read it as a teenage boy ;)


Ziggy_Zugzwang

I always thought "Catcher In The Rye" should have been called "The Emperor's New Clothes"...

TheRealGMBobbyFish
waffllemaster wrote:
How many books worth of knowledge would a player have to read before they know enough to make master?

At least one.  After all the versions of the bible, I suspect the least read books that are bought are chess books.

Ziggy_Zugzwang

I too am a chess book collector. A separate hobby from chess ! Laughing

DonConner

I think as the amount of chess knowledge and understanding increases whatever the number is

increases as competition grows ever stronger and more knowledgible.   Dozens - hundreds...? But other things like practice against masters and tournament competition as well as possibly lessons come into play.    On tactics alone I have worked through 15 - 20 books and am only adequite at the NM level.     Talent plays a large part also.   Some thoughts from someone who earned the US NM  title.

darkunorthodox88

never been a fan of books. only one i ever touched besides opening books as reference was silman's endgame guide.

 

postmortems of your games, tactics, etc are far more important.

testaaaaa
DrSpudnik wrote:

If it takes 10,000 hours, a real slow reader needs to read only one book.

haha grin.png

Bergidum
Natalia_Pogonina wrote:

It's important to keep in mind that simply reading books doesn't make one a master. I've known top GMs who have read just a few chess books in their life and bookwormish A-class players who claim having read over 100 books. A lot depends on how the quality of the books, how deeply you understand the material, and how you put it into practice.

Best comment thus far. 

Ziryab
De la Mesa!

Love the misspelling of this poser’s name.
Dodger111

You could read a thousand and never be a master. 

Or you could read none and become one.

kindaspongey

Has waffllemaster been here since 2012?

hikarunaku

Depends on how deeply you study the book and apply it in your play.Just like reading books won't make you a good programmer unless you apply the knowledge and actually write some code.