Just out of curiosity i wanted to know how many people are above or 2000 elo rated on chess.com 

A 2000 rated player is just a dumber version of a master. We barely have a grasp of all the concepts in chess, we tend to forget about threats and blunder at least once every few games, we usually make a few mistakes and a couple of inaccuracies trying to negate a potential threat while overlooking a completely different threat. It's rough

e

Correct.

“How many people in the world are 2000 elo?“

🤔Hmmm. About a hundred

challenge me if you can

you can check for yourself by going under play, leaderboard, and then rapid. You can see the graph with the distribution of players at different Elo. 2000 Elo is an excellent rating for someone who plays chess just for fun but it's definitely not as complicated as you think. I am 18 years old and I started playing chess when I started this account which was more than 2 years ago. I hope I inspired someone to reach 2000 Elo one day.

2000 and even I am trash. The minimum for being a decent player according to Hikaru is 2300🔥🔥

@yaswamth911

It's a double edge sword. L o l For someone like me who's 33 years old and started playing a year and a half ago, guys like you make guys like me feel like a troglodyte. Lmaooo

I hope to be where you're at someday but recently I have my doubts. Won't stop me from trying though.

always keep trying, if you need any help then feel free to challenge me, we can play some training games and i will talk about every move i will play

This reply section makes me know even more how bad I am at chess I know I’m bad but I didn’t know I was this bad I’m on on y elo 200 and I play for fun

True lol

I just broke 2300 but don't know how to stay there

Btw 2200+ is around 99.7 percentile with around 16000-20000 people at or above that rating

Rapid 2200+ is probably less than 10,000 people in bullet it's around the same at high levels most play blitz(partly because it's he perfect blend of rapid and bullet ) and partly is because it's harder to cheat there

Guess I'm fine with that though id prefer not 10|0 10|0 sucks

Sure but not right now

Ironically 2200+ blitz players like making alts all the time so some of them are bots and others are legit I can never tell lol

Yes but doesn't have to be only 100 points a year recently I've been getting about 300-400 points a year at least

Probably not great at first lol

I have thousands of games true though that's not the only reason I've improved a lot would prob done better if I didn't play so much lol

Don't worry I played more than 30,000 games @llama_l im guessing it's closer to 40,000-50,000 though but tbh more games doesn't mean you improve actually sometimes slowing down is more beneficial cause there are plenty of people who have 10,000+ games but are stuck at 100 or 1000 so it takes more than just playing games

Practice doesn't make perfect you actually have to practice ina way that's beneficial

Back in the days (like in the 90s), chess players used to say that, to them GMs, players at 2000-2200 were the "weak players". Hence, to them, under that, you don't even exist (as a chess player).

Once, I played GM Anatoly Vaisser, former candidate to the World title, in a Rapid tournament. He only wandered around, then came and played a move quickly, then wandered again, and crushed me like I was nothing in like 24 moves. Most irritating. But it says it all about what a 2000 Elo chess player really is: a patzer, just a bit stronger than the other patzers.

It is commonly believed, that chess.com's Rapid rating is over evaluated by 200-300 Elo points compared to the FIDE classical chess Elo rating. But you'll always find exceptions to any such "rule".